- Thread starter
- #26
Clipse
20+ Year Contributor
- 509
- 0
- Sep 25, 2002
-
Renton,
Washington
WTNGST said:What's the down side of reduced base timing? In other words, how much would you recommend reducing it in a effort to control knock and what's the trade off, if any.
I've read that virtually no 92 model ECUs were EPROM. I haven't opened mine but am reasonably sure that it is not. I wouldn't mind having a chip - I just have to find/buy the appropriate ECU and have it socketed. I was working on more basic mods first and didn't anticipate a need for another ECU yet. I appreciate your description of the syndrome. I only wish I had read about it somewhere prior to buying injectors - I would have bought 550s in an attempt to minimize the problem. This might be a dumb question but I'm not a MAFT expert so bear with me: Since I didn't have problems with the MAFT set for 450s the airflow the MAFT was reporting to the ECU worked O.K. for my setup and normal base timing. If I set the MAFT to as small an injector size as the ECU can adjust the mid fuel trim for, am I helping my situation any?
I reduced my base timing to 0btdc and there has been no downside at all. If you have an AFPR, try tuning with that so the ecu isn't seeing so much correction and adding timing hence causing knock. I've got mine down to a max count of 9 in second and 4 in 3rd. Still working the bugs out, but things are looking up.

forums are here: