tsi20gawd
20+ Year Contributor
- 260
- 3
- Aug 19, 2003
-
everett,
Washington
So has anyone actually used a 94mm eagle crank? I dont see a std 150mm rod with a 94mm stroke and a 3mm raised pin being a difficult combo to put togeather?
Bryan
Bryan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yes, moving the pin up more is possible, but it does have some downsides. ..... you'd lose a tiny bit of the top of piston to 1st ringland spacing that is crucial for pistons to live in high boost/temperature environments.
In a nutshell, the piston would work fine, it would just be a little more sensitive to heat/detonation.
yes, but in the 4g64 block... he posted on here about mid-way. "LunchBox" is the name. but, yeah, just order some 153mm rods instead of 159mm and use the stroker pistons and it'd be good in a 4g63. I'm gonna build my 4g63 into a 2.3, so I'll be using a 64 for the 2.2. It's an extra tiny bit of displacement with the bigger bore.So has anyone actually used a 94mm eagle crank?