Welcome to DSMtuners - The Talon, Laser, and Eclipse performance enthusiast resource
























Login


 Featured 
 Products 
 >>>>>> 
Go Back   DSMtuners > DSM Forums > 4G63 DSM Tech > Turbo System Tech

Turbo System Tech Turbos, Intercooling, Boost Control, Wastegates, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-12-2008, 01:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 1989 Colt GT
From: Thornton, Colorado
Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 536
Classifieds Rating: (4)
Reputation: biglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthybiglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Holset Volvo HX-52 Dyno Sheets

Important information.

Dsmlink
HX-52
Eagle/Wiesco 2.0L
Crower 414's
Stock intake manifold
7" tall air/air intercooler
Revhard exhuast manifold

Boost was in the 26-27psi range. Blue line on graphs are boost. Best pull was 530whp. This was on a Dynapack Dyno. It is uber conservative compared to other dynos in town. Reads a hair lower to about the same as a Mustang Dyno. We made 15 pulls today with all pulls being 500-530whp. Not bad for wastegate pressure.






____________________________
16g=12.933@107.44

Last edited by biglady112 : 09-15-2008 at 11:15 PM.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Related Auctions

Sponsored Links
Old 09-12-2008, 01:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: San Francisco, California
Region: NorCal
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 704
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: T9S1i is pretty helpful and trustworthy
you tease you tease!!!!

Cant wait to see the power #'s! Spool looks good. Hope all is well with the car and you can show us some power out of the setup!


____________________________
-Danny
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 04:06 PM   #3 (permalink)
DSM Wiseman
 
CanadianTSi's Avatar
 
From: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Region: Eastern Canada
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,294
Classifieds Rating: (2)
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Quote:
Originally Posted by T9S1i View Post
Spool looks good.
I don't know if I would call 24psi at 6700 good...


____________________________
Tyler Webb.
123.26mph on the Stock 7bolt.
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 04:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
TxR6guy's Avatar
 
From: Haltom, Texas
Region: Southwest
Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 113
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: TxR6guy is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianTSi View Post
I don't know if I would call 24psi at 6700 good...

Hahah exactly, but i bet that car sounds like a freight train comming on after that.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 04:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 225
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: airmail96 is an unknown
Put some nitrous on there or some pre turbo meth injection and call it a day haha.


____________________________
Jason

93 Eagle Talon TSi
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] [blogs] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 06:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: San Francisco, California
Region: NorCal
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 704
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: T9S1i is pretty helpful and trustworthy
for that sized turbo, and it seems to ramp up pretty fast when it did start spooling.


I didnt want to be a jerk and say "post up a real damn dyno sheet or change the title"


____________________________
-Danny
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 06:18 PM   #7 (permalink)
DSMtuners Supporting Vendor
GVAutosport.com
 
From: Philly, Pennsylvania
Region: Tri State
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 208
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: spendone is more helpful than not
The spool isnt bad at all. I have a H1e with the holset 14cm T3 housing and it doesnt hit full boost (33 psi) till 6250 rpms.


____________________________
GVAutosprt.com
215-675-8204

Suck It!
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 07:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 1989 Colt GT
From: Thornton, Colorado
Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 536
Classifieds Rating: (4)
Reputation: biglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthybiglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
I think it is great considering that is is in the neighborhood of a GT42. As well as the dyno being at 6000ft above sea level. And the fact that the turbine is larger than a T4 1.44a/r housing. I think it did great.

And there will not be nitrous on this car. It is plummed. But it is against the rules. This is a salt flat car and nitrous is not allowed there. And the gearing he needs to pulls is the RPM's this turbo shines at.

And it spools faster than a friends 2.3L GT42 ballbearing from no boost to full boost. It ramps up insanely on this car. Albiet later than the other car.

This was just to show all those who have been buzzing about the HX-52 what it can do.

As far as numbers, just snoop around for what GT42's do at those boost levels. That will give you an idea.

Steven


____________________________
16g=12.933@107.44
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 07:56 PM   #9 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
andy4g63's Avatar
 
From: Queens, New York
Region: Tri State
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 403
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: andy4g63 is more helpful than not
Quote:
Originally Posted by biglady112 View Post
I think it is great considering that is is in the neighborhood of a GT42. As well as the dyno being at 6000ft above sea level. And the fact that the turbine is larger than a T4 1.44a/r housing. I think it did great.

And there will not be nitrous on this car. It is plummed. But it is against the rules. This is a salt flat car and nitrous is not allowed there. And the gearing he needs to pulls is the RPM's this turbo shines at.

And it spools faster than a friends 2.3L GT42 ballbearing from no boost to full boost. It ramps up insanely on this car. Albiet later than the other car.

This was just to show all those who have been buzzing about the HX-52 what it can do.

As far as numbers, just snoop around for what GT42's do at those boost levels. That will give you an idea.

Steven

Good job dude. Keep going.
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2008, 10:41 PM   #10 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Blaine, Minnesota
Region: Midwest
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 110
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: turbotalon1g is an unknown
Sick, sorry to hear about the mishap, hopefully you can get it figured out soon and keep rocking
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2008, 06:08 PM   #11 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Reisterstown, Maryland
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 219
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: rhamlinii is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by biglady112 View Post
I think it is great considering that is is in the neighborhood of a GT42. As well as the dyno being at 6000ft above sea level. And the fact that the turbine is larger than a T4 1.44a/r housing. I think it did great.

And there will not be nitrous on this car. It is plummed. But it is against the rules. This is a salt flat car and nitrous is not allowed there. And the gearing he needs to pulls is the RPM's this turbo shines at.

And it spools faster than a friends 2.3L GT42 ballbearing from no boost to full boost. It ramps up insanely on this car. Albiet later than the other car.

This was just to show all those who have been buzzing about the HX-52 what it can do.

As far as numbers, just snoop around for what GT42's do at those boost levels. That will give you an idea.

Steven
Yeah, I didn't think you would spool it as soon as I read something about a t-6 . I'm still very curious to how long it would last and pictures of the setup if you have them. Are you using the stock intake manifold to help spool the turbo, or you haven't changed over to an afftermarket unit? I've noticed you seem to use the "stocker" on your builds more then most.


____________________________
14bpwr
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2008, 12:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 1989 Colt GT
From: Thornton, Colorado
Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 536
Classifieds Rating: (4)
Reputation: biglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthybiglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
This is someone else's car. A good friend of mine. He see's no point in going to a different intake. He does have a few tricks done though.

My car can't fit many intakes. Niether could the mirage. But most important is I have never had the money at the right time for an intake. Heck, after 7 years I finally got my first set of aftermarket cams two weeks ago. My ideal intake manifold for my personal car would be the forrester racing intake. After seeing a few in person it would be the only way I would want to go.

Basically for me, I just try and make the most of what I have always. I am not super rich and have bills and life to live. Even, though I have spent some serious cash, I try to compliment parts and build the best I can.
Steven


____________________________
16g=12.933@107.44
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 07:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 1989 Colt GT
From: Thornton, Colorado
Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 536
Classifieds Rating: (4)
Reputation: biglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthybiglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Numbers installed in the first post. Rebuilt the engine saturday night, ended up being the owners fault. Helped him this time and made sure things were right this time. That happens when you work 20-22 hours a day for two straight weeks. Made 15 clean pulls today on the dyno. He and his brother are currently in route to World Of Speed in Utah.

Steven


____________________________
16g=12.933@107.44
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 09:14 PM   #14 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Warrior, Alabama
Region: Southeast
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 86
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: topnotchgsx is an unknown
But yet no numbers What good is that? :P
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 09:53 PM   #15 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 1989 Colt GT
From: Thornton, Colorado
Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 536
Classifieds Rating: (4)
Reputation: biglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthybiglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
It is in the first post. Read like you were taught to.


____________________________
16g=12.933@107.44
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 10:00 PM   #16 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Warrior, Alabama
Region: Southeast
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 86
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: topnotchgsx is an unknown
Yes, I am retarded! . Nice numbers. Once it's really pushed boost wise is when she will shine!
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 10:55 PM   #17 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
95tzlgst's Avatar
 
From: beaufort, South Carolina
Region: Southeast
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 139
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: 95tzlgst is an unknown
Those are some nice numbers. I wish him the best of luck.


____________________________
Tyler K./hx35
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 01:58 PM   #18 (permalink)
DSM Wiseman
 
dsm-onster's Avatar
 
From: Bloxom, Virginia
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,463
Classifieds Rating: (5)
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Wow! Get the boost remotely close to where the turbo was built an you're looking at 650whp. That is, if he even wants to go this far. This turbo has 300whp more in it for sure . I can't believe this is a hair over 25psi. I don't think some of us understand how much this thing flows. The spool looks great for a +90 lb/min turbo.


____________________________
Matt
dd '90 GST, Holset H1C
Online  

[posts] [gallery] [blogs] Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 02:20 PM   #19 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Slippi84's Avatar
 
From: Blackwood, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,841
Classifieds Rating: (7)
Reputation: Slippi84 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsm-onster View Post
Wow! Get the boost remotely close to where the turbo was built an you're looking at 650whp. That is, if he even wants to go this far. This turbo has 300whp more in it for sure . I can't believe this is a hair over 25psi. I don't think some of us understand how much this thing flows. The spool looks great for a +90 lb/min turbo.
Yeah run more dam bost I wanna see some 700+hp levels lol. Good job man I planned on running more like 456 psi with my hx52 so seeing this makes me pretty souped at what that kinda boost might make. Is this on a 2.0 or 2.3? I'm not gonna lie I can't tell boost response/lag from these kinda graphs and I know you used the same type with your 650hp hx40 setup
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 04:35 PM   #20 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Reisterstown, Maryland
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 219
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: rhamlinii is an unknown
I thouight the turb would make more power compared to a 42r


____________________________
14bpwr
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 01:38 AM   #21 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 1989 Colt GT
From: Thornton, Colorado
Region: Rocky Mountain
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 536
Classifieds Rating: (4)
Reputation: biglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthybiglady112 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Again. This is a low reading load bearing dyno. I am not sure I would say it is more than a GT42, but right about what one can do. Most guys are doing 600-650whp on dynojets with GT42's at this boost level. I firmly believe we would be right there on a dynojet.

For now the boost will stay down so the car can stay reliable. We want to see what 40+psi would do, but he has an event today(wednesday) in utah. It is a four day race so we need the car to stay together.

This power level will pull the mph he needs for his record.

Steven


____________________________
16g=12.933@107.44
Offline  

[posts]