Welcome to DSMtuners - The Talon, Laser, and Eclipse performance enthusiast resource
























Login


 Featured 
 Products 
 >>>>>> 
Go Back   DSMtuners > DSM Forums > 4G63 DSM Tech > Turbo System Tech

Turbo System Tech Turbos, Intercooling, Boost Control, Wastegates, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2008, 11:19 PM   #31 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
BlackHawkAWD91's Avatar
 
From: Charleston, South Carolina
Region: Southeast
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 90
Classifieds Rating: (3)
Reputation: BlackHawkAWD91 is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by diambo4life View Post
67mm turbo does not have an on-off switch on a 2.0L. Power onset is very smooth and gradual.
I would like to consider my 67mm on a 2.0L hits pretty hard, but it's a T4 setup with a nice manifold.

From my dyno graph at 31-32psi, I go from 220ishTQ@4200 to 460TQ@4900 (roughly) Also 180HP at 4200, 450@ 4900rpms (roughly).

The FP88HTA should be a badass turbo, but without a doubt put it in a T4 housing.



____________________________
T4-DBB T67
E85- 570AWHP/461TQ Mustang Dyno
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Related Auctions

Sponsored Links
Old 06-04-2008, 04:38 PM   #32 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Clinton, Missouri
Region: Midwest
Registered: Feb 2006
Posts: 504
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: The_EE is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Hey Boz, is Paul ( white evo ) still there? Tell Al, Jen and Paul that Jason ( Silver GSX ) says hi!
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 11:29 PM   #33 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Riverside, California
Region: SoCal
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 90
Classifieds Rating: (5)
Reputation: TheBoz is an unknown
Here is the dyno Video.


Galant VR4 460AWHP Dyno Video Tuning Technologies
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 05:55 AM   #34 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Slippi84's Avatar
 
From: Blackwood, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,840
Classifieds Rating: (7)
Reputation: Slippi84 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackHawkAWD91 View Post
I would like to consider my 67mm on a 2.0L hits pretty hard, but it's a T4 setup with a nice manifold.

From my dyno graph at 31-32psi, I go from 220ishTQ@4200 to 460TQ@4900 (roughly) Also 180HP at 4200, 450@ 4900rpms (roughly).

The FP88HTA should be a badass turbo, but without a doubt put it in a T4 housing.

That must be a stroker cause no way a 67mm turbo in t4 housing spooled that good.

Edit: I just looked at your profile you have 9:1 block I take it that is the reason. Kinda makes me happy to see higher compression has that much of an affect on spool. A lot of people used to argue that the 8:5:1 2g pistons on 1g rods didn't do anything but obviously it does.
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 07:59 AM   #35 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
diambo4life's Avatar
 
From: Springfield, Missouri
Region: Midwest
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 656
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: diambo4life is more helpful than not
Rob's case is atypical. His setup just spools really well. It will not apply to many 67 setups on 2 liters esp. those with sizable housings. Not .63a/r junk. It could be the divided housing he's using too. C.R. doesn't really affect spool much. My car gets full spool at the EXACT RPM with the stock 7.8:1 C.R. and the 9:1 it has now on the same setup. That's more than one point increase with no change in spool. Displacement helps a ton though.


____________________________
104mph in the 1/8th (best) E85
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 08:10 AM   #36 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Slippi84's Avatar
 
From: Blackwood, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,840
Classifieds Rating: (7)
Reputation: Slippi84 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by diambo4life View Post
Rob's case is atypical. His setup just spools really well. It will not apply to many 67 setups on 2 liters esp. those with sizable housings. Not .63a/r junk. It could be the divided housing he's using too. C.R. doesn't really affect spool much. My car gets full spool at the EXACT RPM with the stock 7.8:1 C.R. and the 9:1 it has now on the same setup. That's more than one point increase with no change in spool. Displacement helps a ton though.
Hmm well I figured he was more the exception than the rule but still that's pretty good spool characteristics no matter how you cut it. I'm going t3 .70ar with my setup trying to keep it street friendly with good top end.
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2008, 10:13 PM   #37 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Riverside, California
Region: SoCal
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 90
Classifieds Rating: (5)
Reputation: TheBoz is an unknown
Also my max timing was 13 degrees at full load and full boost.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 10:20 AM   #38 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Slippi84's Avatar
 
From: Blackwood, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,840
Classifieds Rating: (7)
Reputation: Slippi84 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by diambo4life View Post
Rob's case is atypical. His setup just spools really well. It will not apply to many 67 setups on 2 liters esp. those with sizable housings. Not .63a/r junk. It could be the divided housing he's using too. C.R. doesn't really affect spool much. My car gets full spool at the EXACT RPM with the stock 7.8:1 C.R. and the 9:1 it has now on the same setup. That's more than one point increase with no change in spool. Displacement helps a ton though.
What kinda power increase did you see at the same given boost when you switched?
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 12:11 PM   #39 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
diambo4life's Avatar
 
From: Springfield, Missouri
Region: Midwest
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 656
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: diambo4life is more helpful than not
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slippi84 View Post
What kinda power increase did you see at the same given boost when you switched?

Can't say. I only dyno'd the car after. I'm not a big fan of high compression pistons actually. Just got a good deal on these slugs and said "..why not?"


____________________________
104mph in the 1/8th (best) E85
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 12:33 PM   #40 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Slippi84's Avatar
 
From: Blackwood, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,840
Classifieds Rating: (7)
Reputation: Slippi84 is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Quote:
Originally Posted by diambo4life View Post
Can't say. I only dyno'd the car after. I'm not a big fan of high compression pistons actually. Just got a good deal on these slugs and said "..why not?"
I'm in the same boat. I half regret it actually. But I wouldn't have got even close to as crazy as I have had I not found the deal I did and my deal was for a assembled shortblock so I REALLY couldn't say no. But just from yoru butt dyno do you think the transient response with a big turbo and extra power is noticable or just a waste?
Online  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 09:58 PM   #41 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
NewTurboTuner's Avatar
 
From: Auburn, Washington
Region: Pacific Northwest
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 290
Classifieds Rating: (3)
Reputation: NewTurboTuner is pretty helpful and trustworthy
I think 460 @ 24lbs is pretty good!

I'm very interested to see how the turbo responds at higher boost. I'm getting a GT4088R soon and It'll be cool to see how these compare.

Make sure to keep us updated!


____________________________
~SteveB
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 09:48 AM   #42 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 824
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: vaboys2ndgen is an unknown
Called and talked with FP today will have my mitsu flanged hta88 thursday


____________________________
Jeremy (jpick)
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 10:03 AM   #43 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Riverside, California
Region: SoCal
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 90
Classifieds Rating: (5)
Reputation: TheBoz is an unknown
Galant VR4(12.4@115) vs Tacoma

Galant VR4(12.6@115) vs Mustang GT

A few videos of my track runs. The car is still running awesome. The car was only running about 20-22psi, manual boost controllers suck.

California Speed Way (6/14/08)
RT ... 0.166
60' ... 1.883
330 ... 5.326
1/8 ... 8.077
MPH ... 86.68
1000 ... 10.451
1/4 ... 12.420
MPH ... 115.36

And yes I still need to learn how to drive . It is getting there, everytime to the track the car gets faster.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 11:33 AM   #44 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 824
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: vaboys2ndgen is an unknown
good stuff boz. i can't wait to get mine up and running and hit the track. what happened with the MBC?


____________________________
Jeremy (jpick)
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2008, 08:05 PM   #45 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Riverside, California
Region: SoCal
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 90
Classifieds Rating: (5)
Reputation: TheBoz is an unknown
They are very inconsistent. So, the boost bounces from 19.5psi-22.3psi and back an fourth. I have an eletronic one I just have to fix the wiring on it and tune it. I have an 18psi WG Spring in right now, but once it goes above that, the MBC just does not want to keep the boost at 24.5psi. I will get it sorted out, I have bigger things that need adjustment. Like my launch 1.8 60's are ok, but I would like to see the 1.5-1.6 60's. I also need shift faster between gears and setup the NLTS. I should be able to get the traps, and overall et much better.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 01:14 AM   #46 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 824
Classifieds Rating: (1)
Reputation: vaboys2ndgen is an unknown
gotcha i'm kinda skeptical to run my turbosmart dual stage MBC now... but i've heard at high boost levels 28+ or so that MBC is the way to go.


____________________________
Jeremy (jpick)
Offline  

[webpage] [posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 10:04 AM   #47 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: garland, Texas
Region: Gulf Coast
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 138
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: bastard dsm is an unknown
your mph sould be higher with those #'s, i ran 12.0 @ 119mph with 445hp on my gvr4.
your car sounds good, i was looking into the fp hta but i might go with a bw turbo.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 12:00 PM   #48 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
NewTurboTuner's Avatar
 
From: Auburn, Washington
Region: Pacific Northwest
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 290
Classifieds Rating: (3)
Reputation: NewTurboTuner is pretty helpful and trustworthy
Is your car full weight TheBoz?


____________________________
~SteveB
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 03:05 PM   #49 (permalink)
DSM Wiseman
 
daren_p's Avatar
 
From: Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
Region: Central Canada
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,669
Classifieds Rating: (2)
Reputation: You can trust this leader of the site
Sounds like its coming along nicely, I wouldn't worry about some of the comments. There's always somebody, who knows somebody who made more power on less boost with a smaller turbo, with one cylinder not running, etc, etc Add some timing in that tune & I'm sure things will really start to wake up
Offline  

[posts] [gallery] Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 09:14 PM   #50 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Riverside, California
Region: SoCal
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 90
Classifieds Rating: (5)
Reputation: TheBoz is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewTurboTuner View Post
Is your car full weight The