DSMlink VS. AFC, VPC, Datalogger

[UndergroundR32]

I'm trying to decide what the smartest thing would be for me to do. With the AFC VPC combo you would need a tmo chip in order to adjust your rev limit and for a clutch cut mod. (edit: my mistake I just now see that the stutterbox and clutch cut is available with the DSLlink)

The DSMlink still monitors air intake via the MAF sensor, right? Although I'm not too clear on what the big advantage would be with a speed density setup like the Vein Pressure Converter?

And are their any tuning avantages with the AFC VPC combo? The price for the DSMlink and a laptop would be much cheaper than an AFC, VPC, datalogging software, TMO chip, and an m100 or any other pda.

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

[-=TWITCH=-]

my setup is going to be

tmo stage 3 (hopefully in the mail)
s-afc
pocketlogger


and your set

 

[UndergroundR32]

You're on a stock turbo right? That would be fine for you. I'm going with someone more along the lines of a Green or a t3/t4 50 trim. I'm told that it's worth it to go with the VPC in place of a 1st gen MAF sensor. Otherwise I would just go with the dsmlink since it seems to do everything an afc and datalogger would.

 

[sunflashx]

You have a 92 car. DSMLink is for 95 and newer.

 

[UndergroundR32]

I'm glad someone clued me in to that! thank you

 

[TSi92]

VPC with AFC is a proven way to go fast. Maybe old school but it still works.

 

[candela]

Yes depending on your goals, Im sure just a 2g maf, afc will work...