93'colttsi
15+ Year Contributor
- 95
- 8
- Dec 28, 2007
-
Chilliwack,
BC, Canada
MVI_2535.flv video by Indyraman - Photobucket
Numbers for the colt:
HP = 208
TQ = 195
PS: The clutch was slipping badly so I imagine it would have put down a bit higher if the clutch held.
Max boost = 17.4
Mods on colt = 14b, Ebay evo I-III FMIC kit, K&N, Walbro 255HP, MBC (ball&spring),510cc, 3" GM mas + MAFT, +Removed downpipe from turbo for pulls.
I also dyno'ed my evo 1 as well. Here is the video of the evo.
MVI_2538.flv video by Indyraman - Photobucket
The numbers.
Max HP = 172
Max TQ = 184
Max boost = 14.2
For preformance mods the car is all stock besides the ARC airbox. (which has a crappy paper air filter BTW)
The numbers seem a bit low but the owner of the dyno said that its probably putting around 240 Crank HP, which is right on track then I guess.
Remember this is on a Mustang Dynometer, not a dynojet or dynopack that read higher or sometimes put out fudged numbers to "look good"
Numbers for the colt:
HP = 208
TQ = 195
PS: The clutch was slipping badly so I imagine it would have put down a bit higher if the clutch held.
Max boost = 17.4
Mods on colt = 14b, Ebay evo I-III FMIC kit, K&N, Walbro 255HP, MBC (ball&spring),510cc, 3" GM mas + MAFT, +Removed downpipe from turbo for pulls.
I also dyno'ed my evo 1 as well. Here is the video of the evo.
MVI_2538.flv video by Indyraman - Photobucket
The numbers.
Max HP = 172
Max TQ = 184
Max boost = 14.2
For preformance mods the car is all stock besides the ARC airbox. (which has a crappy paper air filter BTW)
The numbers seem a bit low but the owner of the dyno said that its probably putting around 240 Crank HP, which is right on track then I guess.
Remember this is on a Mustang Dynometer, not a dynojet or dynopack that read higher or sometimes put out fudged numbers to "look good"
