Caithness
15+ Year Contributor
- 342
- 1
- Nov 2, 2003
-
Tampa,
Florida
Just noticed they've changed their spring recommendations for their cams, and are now much more specific about what the cams need. Big change for the FP2x-
"FPCam2x
Dual valve springs required. This cam needs 280lb of force over the nose of the cam. When using STDuals, you will find that an installed height of 1.470-1.490" is needed. This "x" version of the FPCam2 increases valve acceleration and valve dwell near max lift to increase torque and widen the power band. Similar to the FPCam3 but not specifically designed around the piston speed of 100mm stroke crankshafts."
Went from "dual springs recommended" to "you need to shim our dual springs that are stiff as hell to start with". Some of the other cams had changes in the requirements too, the 2x was just the biggest jump.
http://linux.forcedperformance.net/...de=FP&Product_Code=FPCamInt&Category_Code=DSM
"FPCam2x
Dual valve springs required. This cam needs 280lb of force over the nose of the cam. When using STDuals, you will find that an installed height of 1.470-1.490" is needed. This "x" version of the FPCam2 increases valve acceleration and valve dwell near max lift to increase torque and widen the power band. Similar to the FPCam3 but not specifically designed around the piston speed of 100mm stroke crankshafts."
Went from "dual springs recommended" to "you need to shim our dual springs that are stiff as hell to start with". Some of the other cams had changes in the requirements too, the 2x was just the biggest jump.
http://linux.forcedperformance.net/...de=FP&Product_Code=FPCamInt&Category_Code=DSM
