| 420A Turbo Conversion Turbo kits, swaps, etc - specific to 2G N/T DSMs. |
01-04-2006, 06:53 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: kelowna, B.C., Canada
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 342
Reputation:
|
best egt spot?
where is the best spot to put your egt at?i see most guys put it on the exhaust manifold on the 4th cylinder, or does it make a big difference if u put it on your downpipe? thanks
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-04-2006, 07:21 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
DSM Wiseman
From: North, Florida
Region: Southeast
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,700
Reputation:
|
Depends on who you ask. One set of people put it in the runner on the exhaust manifold. The other set of people put it in the downpipe. If it is in the exhaust manifold and something breaks, the turbine on the turbo is going to be toast. If this is for your N/T put it on the exhaust manifold.
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-04-2006, 10:43 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
DSM N/T Wiseman
From: Phoenix, Arizona
Region: Southwest
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,543
Reputation:
|
#4 runner before the turbo. Do it right and install a proper bung for it.
____________________________
DR1665.com | GVR4 rally
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-04-2006, 11:04 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
DSM Wiseman
From: Chesterfield, Virginia
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,717
Reputation:
|
I myself would install it right after the turbo in the dp or o2 housing. I have 2 reasons for my preference.
1) The turbo will live a long healthy life even if the probe decides to come apart.
2) In the ex manifold, it isnt too unusual to see 1600* egt in some applications. With it in the dp, the temp will be a little lower and you end up with a temp reading that that is actually useable. Most egt gauges only go to 1600* so how could you really see a change or problem if the gauge is already maxxed out before the problem arises? Its not a tuning device, just a monitoring device.
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-04-2006, 11:18 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Killeen ( Deployed Iraq), Texas
Region: Southwest
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,563
Reputation: 
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 92awddsm
I myself would install it right after the turbo in the dp or o2 housing. I have 2 reasons for my preference.
1) The turbo will live a long healthy life even if the probe decides to come apart.
2) In the ex manifold, it isnt too unusual to see 1600* egt in some applications. With it in the dp, the temp will be a little lower and you end up with a temp reading that that is actually useable. Most egt gauges only go to 1600* so how could you really see a change or problem if the gauge is already maxxed out before the problem arises? Its not a tuning device, just a monitoring device.
|
i think you tap the runner because if it's good there it should be good everywhere else. i have never seen egts higher that 1550 in mine. i drive the poop out of my car too.
|
|
Online
|
|
01-04-2006, 11:21 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Non-Supporting Vendor
hirevperformance
From: NORCAL, California
Region: NorCal
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,737
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by selmerguy
i think you tap the runner because if it's good there it should be good everywhere else. i have never seen egts higher that 1550 in mine. i drive the poop out of my car too.
|
Being good in a place and being the best place for it are too different things. I have to agree with 92awddsm for the shear fact that if the probe does decide to break you are not out a probe and turbo, only a probe.
____________________________
-zach-
HiRevPerformance
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-04-2006, 11:53 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
From: Dayton, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,260
Reputation:
|
The reason most tap the #1 cylinder exhaust runner is because the #1 cylinder, being the furthest from fuel feed on the fuel rail, is the cylinder most likely and the first to go lean.
____________________________
Bruce
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-04-2006, 11:59 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
DSM Wiseman
From: Chesterfield, Virginia
Region: Mid Atlantic
Registered: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,717
Reputation:
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by selmerguy
i think you tap the runner because if it's good there it should be good everywhere else. i have never seen egts higher that 1550 in mine. i drive the poop out of my car too.
|
Thats why I stated "in some applications", not all. Ive been through the down side of mounting it in the manifold. A new probe is $100. A new turbo and probe for me would cost $1000, 10 times as much as what it would cost to replace a probe. First time you lose the probe, you would probably change your setup also and then swear by it.
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-05-2006, 12:15 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
From: Dayton, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,260
Reputation:
|
Nevermind my previous post, I keep forgeting that I'm in the nt forum. 
____________________________
Bruce
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-05-2006, 12:25 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: The "O", Florida
Region: Southeast
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,290
Reputation: 
|
420a guys tap the #4 runner
EDIT: darn the dirty diaper...I would have got ya before you posted 
____________________________
-Xavier
...fastest Eclipse Type RS+T in Alaska
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-06-2006, 07:26 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
Car: Evo IX / 96 RS-T
From: phillipsburg, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 415
Reputation: 
|
i'd say number 4 runner even though its gonna screw up your turbo if it breaks because at least you get accurate temperatures. Most people say not to take the EGT's past 1550-1600* anyways. Also the lower temperatures from having it in the downpipe kind of result in having to figure out what too high of a temperature is, its almost like you have to convert whatever reading you get in the dp and estimate what temperature there is equal to 1600* before the turbo. Someone also mentioned having a broader range of temperatures because your highest readings would be more towards the middle of the gauge if you place it in the downpipe, but once again nobody recommends letting your EGT's go over 1600 so its not like you need more room on the gauge.
haha bruce surfin the nt forum, and no longer just a wiseman, now you've got full mod authority, get the car together yet?
|
|
Offline
|
|
02-05-2006, 09:36 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Washington Court House, Ohio
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 159
Reputation:
|
The instructions with mine say 3 inches past the outlet on the turbo. I had it in the header before prior to the start of the turbo project so now im sitting with a bung in my hand wondering manifold or DP.
You guys seem to be 50/50 and the manufacture says DP, anyone else running the autometer probe?
|
|
Offline
|
|
02-05-2006, 11:13 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
Car: Evo IX / 96 RS-T
From: phillipsburg, New Jersey
Region: Tri State
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 415
Reputation: 
|
the temperature difference after the turbo is huge. So you can put it on the manifold and get much more accurate temperatures and risk breaking your turbo if the probe breaks, or you can put it after the turbo save your turbo in case the probe breaks but possibly melt some pistons because there's much more guessing at actual temperatures inside the engine. It's your choice which you'd rather risk having to replace. I'd say put it in the manifold though.
|
|
Offline
|
|
02-05-2006, 04:08 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Washington Court House, Ohio
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 159
Reputation:
|
Ive no preference either way, im just wondering why the manufacture said to put it after the turbo.
The guy I bought the kit from said to put it in the turbo housing just on the other side of the manifold flange. Putting a stainless bung in that cast housing would be a trick though.
Seems like most guys are going with the manifold, which is fine with me so long as I can put it on the bottom where you wont be able to see my crappy welding.
I think I will put it right under the wastegate that I cant use because its too tall for me to close the friggin hood.
|
|
Offline
|
|
02-20-2006, 03:54 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Joliet, Illinois
Region: Midwest
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 411
|
Actually I agree with OldMan. Cylinder 1 is my location as well and is furthest from the fuel feed which can be the leanest. All the info i have searched on the net supports this.
OldMan, dont froget even though we are non-turbo the cylinder #1 is still the furthest from our feed.
|
|
Offline
|
|
02-21-2006, 07:16 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: The "O", Florida
Region: Southeast
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,290
Reputation: 
|
ohh...he speaks 
____________________________
-Xavier
...fastest Eclipse Type RS+T in Alaska
|
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 AM.
|