View Single Post
Old 12-19-2007, 03:11 PM   #37 (permalink)
ceedawg
Proven Member
 
ceedawg's Avatar
 
From: laurelton, New York
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 362
Classifieds Rating: (0)
Reputation: ceedawg is an unknown
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve93Talon View Post
Bearing in mind that all 3 will be choked by using the bolt-on housing, I'd say the compressor flow would be 362>35r>HX40. The 3065 uses a 30r hotside to help it spool faster, which is significantly smaller than the others. The closer comparison would be the FP3565, which is a true 35r in the FP bolt-on housing.

My personal opinion with the FP bolt-ons is that they defeat the whole point of a bolt-on, which is to save money. A 3065 setup with v-band gate, their custom o2 housing, oil filter, lines, and everything is well over $2k. For that money you could do a T3 setup and make more power.
Yes I felt that this setup (FP3065,52)was quite expensive and worked. I saw quite a few 11 and 10 sec times using these turbs with great mph in the 1/4mile.
However ,the economics won't make sense if the same hp can be made in a less complicated way with the three turbos mentioned,namingly the S362. Just as long as you don't feel I have to chg my int mani for now I'd highly consider that turbo perhaps over the HX40xpro.

I just wish I had someone to take this New never used HX40/35 hybrid I bought from GREperformance.

Last edited by ceedawg : 12-19-2007 at 06:16 PM.
Offline  

[posts] Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links