BatmanGSX
20+ Year Contributor
- 679
- 3
- Jun 5, 2002
By looking at the compressor maps of these turbos, specifically the 50, 54, 57 and 60 trims we can see that the 50-trim has a max flow just left of 50lb/min. Both the 54 and 57 trim turbos are just right of 45lb/min. The 60 trim is just left of 50lb/min but operates happily at much lower PRs than the 50 trim.
So I'm wondering why some "popular" vendors lead people to believe the 50 trim is the "smallest", the 54 trim is a little bigger, the 57 trim is "the first step up to large turbos" and why they even sell the 60 trim at all? I guess they don't understand the concept that ratios (what trims are) don't necessarily indicate size. It must be pretty easy to sell turbos to people when you just line them up in numerical order of their exducer/inducer ratio. It probably would take to much time to be truthful I suppose.
So I'm wondering why some "popular" vendors lead people to believe the 50 trim is the "smallest", the 54 trim is a little bigger, the 57 trim is "the first step up to large turbos" and why they even sell the 60 trim at all? I guess they don't understand the concept that ratios (what trims are) don't necessarily indicate size. It must be pretty easy to sell turbos to people when you just line them up in numerical order of their exducer/inducer ratio. It probably would take to much time to be truthful I suppose.
