Ryan H
20+ Year Contributor
- 70
- 0
- Nov 19, 2002
Okay, so here it is. The 2g MAS runs 20% leaner than the 1g mas right so it would make sense for us 1g guys that are running the 2g mas to see 20% less on the Hz readings when compared to the 1g mas?
In my case my max Hz with the 1g mas was 1800, then when I swapped in the 2g mas it went down to 1500Hz, that is about 20% less...makes sense right.
So the final question is in my case now with the 2g mas I'm hitting max 1800Hz, so would it be right to say that in fact I am actually flowing 2150Hz if I was to have a 1g mas? cause i keep seeing a few of you guys with the same setup as me but running a hacked 1g mas or Al bhala whatever mas pushing 2100-2200Hz, yet i can only manage 1800 with my 2g mas.
Any input would be great.
In my case my max Hz with the 1g mas was 1800, then when I swapped in the 2g mas it went down to 1500Hz, that is about 20% less...makes sense right.
So the final question is in my case now with the 2g mas I'm hitting max 1800Hz, so would it be right to say that in fact I am actually flowing 2150Hz if I was to have a 1g mas? cause i keep seeing a few of you guys with the same setup as me but running a hacked 1g mas or Al bhala whatever mas pushing 2100-2200Hz, yet i can only manage 1800 with my 2g mas.
Any input would be great.