Ok fill me in!

[95Eclipsers]

OK Wet or dry on my 95 rs what kind do u recommend and what is the easiest to install and what are the prices... also
Call me stupid but theres a company that make E-ram turbochargers, and im goin to be givin them a try on there super mode, it it electronic and it is used with a switch now should i look out for nitrous wiht this er does it really not matter...

 

[aggressivemport]

The eletric turbo and supercharger kits are crap!

As far as nitrous goes I would recommend a wet kit . As far as install a dry kit is easier but not what I would recommend. I am a dealer of NX which is a wet kit and the same kit that I run on my personal car. You can email me for prices and info as I am not allowed to post them here.

 

[NosLaser]

Aggressiveimport's advice is actually backwards for your application. You have a non-turbo RS, and the ideal kit for your car would be a dry kit. For naturally aspirated cars for shots under 100HP, a dry kit is going to provide maximum gains. The reason for this is simple; atomization. With a dry kit, you have great atomization as this high pressure cloud of nitrous mixes well and carries well with air. When you introduce fuel, the air must carry this 'heavy' liquid fuel as well as the cloud of air, resulting in a less than ideal mix of fuel and nitrous. When this happens, you also run the risk of incurring a nitrous backfire. On a dry kit, fuel is added via increased fuel pressure. On a naturally aspirated car, you aren't really taxing your fuel system, so a dry kit can do it's job just as intended. Now, for a turbo car, I definately recommend a wet kit because your fuel system's pressure is already being taxed by boost pressure on our rising rate FPR's. The other advantage a turbo car has over a nat. aspirated car when running a wet kit, is the boost pressure in the upper IC pipe forces the fuel and air mixture into the cylinders; it's got enough strength to carry the heavy fuel without puddling. Hope this helps.

Regards,