The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

More reliable: ACT 2100 or Stock Replacement?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

dj_zero

15+ Year Contributor
86
0
Sep 4, 2004
Byram, New Jersey
Well, my N/T is going to need a new clutch soon enough and I'd like to go to an ACT 2100, but from what I'm gathering from ACT-related posts, I really can't tell if it will last me longer than a stock replacement or not. This car definitely isn't going to be professionally raced. It may get beat like a red-headed stepchild from time to time though. Do you think it would be OK if I wen to the ACT? Or should I stay stock?
 
I do not see what is with all the ACT bashing on this forum. I feel they still make a good clutch, just an older style of one. Its all in what you prefer.

Anyway, I would consider a Centerforce Dual Friction. Its only $230 (for the NT version) from Nopi and it holds really nice. My friend had one in his TSi AWD for almost 100k decently hard miles. A NT FWD would be way less hard on it.

Later
Arnie
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top