Fuel rails: Aeromotive vs. Magnus

[JeanDSM]

I know both are good ones, probalbly none aver better than the other but im looking for a fuel rail, i like the aeromotive ideas, cus i also have a aeromovive fuel pressure regulator and soon the filter too, so it will look good under the hood.

Also i will be buying a magnis SMIM soon, so it will also match. And i like the idea that magnus specialize on DSM's

what would you do in my place?

 

[Rice Over Wheat]

Spend my money on something that would actually net me some performance gain.

 

[2gAWDTalon]

Stock rail = over 600awhp of flow... and more!

 

[vintagemuscle]

I have the Magnus rail. The bore is huge and the fitment is perfect...

 

[95blackGsTurbo]

I have seen both and the fitment is perfect but I agree with Rice_Over_Wheat. Buy something else that will net you some gains. Fuel rail is WAY down the road.

 

[logic]

I can't believe I'm even responding to this, but anyway. Things to think about when looking at fuel rails:

• There's something to be said for having a larger cavity in the fuel rail than the ID of your feed line.
• If you're running methanol, make sure the rail is annodized if it's made of aluminum. While not strictly necessary, it might be a good idea for E85 or other methanol blends for peace of mind.
• The design of the fuel rail is important. You don't want to have something like this happen because the brackets holding the rail to the head let go and you end up with a nice mist of fuel spraying all over your engine bay. (More details in this thread, but the problem was laid at Aeromotive's feet.)
• Fitting compatibility: are the inlet and outlet designed for a stock fitting, or do they take something else natively (AN, NPT, etc)? Will this work for your setup, or will you require additional hardware to make it work?
• Fitting location: are the inlet and outlet in the stock location, or is the rail shorter than stock to allow more room for larger fittings? (Or is the rail longer, making even stock fittings a tight fit?)