The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

ported 2g manifold vs dnp or sbr tubular manifold???

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

highintenzity4

15+ Year Contributor
221
0
Apr 30, 2004
Mission, Texas
Getting a new manifold for my new setup with 40mm tial wg... Stuck on either a heavily ported 2g manifold and the dnp or sbr tubular manifold... Going to run a fp red.... Ive seen many people still running 2g manifolds going faster than 10s.... Which is recommended for high hp cars?
 
JDNSBR said:
Here check this out and this should be able to help you. :rocks:
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=206398

Ok I just read that thread, so say you don't daily drive the car. Would a tubular manifold be better for a track used car? Because I was always a supporter of SBR cast mani and DNP tubular manifold; but never knew which manifold I would eventually select. In about five more months I plan to get a fp3065 once I get my last supporting mods, and want to know what manifold would be better for me, wanting it to be long lasting?
 
For a track car again there are pro's and there are cons. The tubular will get you a little bit faster spool up than the cast. The tubular is also a little bit lighter than the cast. But you still have the chance of the tubular cracking.

So for a complete track car, I say tubular. For a street/track car, cast is the best choice in my opinion. :)
 
Sbr has both and even has their own tubular design... do both the sbr and dnp tubular have 7cm? are they almost identical?
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Latest posts

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top