The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Different twist on IC and exhaust piping (clearance issues)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

SolidBoostTSi

15+ Year Contributor
167
4
Sep 27, 2004
Roundlake, Illinois
Well guys after alot of perusing random hotrod sites and being diverted to spam up the yin-yang I found this.... http://www.drgas.com/store/home.php?cat=8 This may be really usefull as far as space constrictions (not just our cars specifically) when fabricating One-off exhausts and Intercooler plumbing setups. Hopefully this opens up another avenue for the tuner community and makes plumbing a little easier:thumb:

- Solid
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 
SolidBoostTSi said:
Well guys after alot of perusing random hotrod sites and being diverted to spam up the yin-yang I found this.... http://www.drgas.com/store/home.php?cat=8 This may be really usefull as far as space constrictions (not just our cars specifically) when fabricating One-off exhausts and Intercooler plumbing setups. Hopefully this opens up another avenue for the tuner community and makes plumbing a little easier:thumb:

- Solid
You must be logged in to view this image or video.









Nice try, but this would be something I would vehemently be agaist. :notgood: When aiming for ideal performance, you want the least number of bends and the least number of diameter changes when regarding intercooler piping and exhaust piping. I can't stress this enough. So while your effort was honest, the outcome is far from ideal. This link is a good one to refer to. Read up. :)
 
well, the point of this post was to give another way to fabrication. If I'm not mistaken aren't oval tubes better for ground clearance? and most of us here have lower than stock ried hieght? I know from experience I DO NOT LIKE BOTTOMING OUT and scraping a very expensive exhaust. Then again what do you have to lose? a single oval tube that is 20% larger can be used in place of a round tube. And the losses are marginal.

Take for example - 1G Short route FMIC piping
the two holes in the core support that you feed tubes into... you can use an oval tube that transitions into a round tube. I may not be an engineer but it only makes sense that if you can make things easier and do it in a way that the factory may have done it why not...

look at the SRT-4's LICP you will notice that it is OVAL for a reason... CLEARANCE.
look at Stock Cars ( NASCAR ), USLemans, USRRC, they utilize the fact that they can A 1/4 INCH off the gound at speeds of over 200mph with 500lbs of Downforce and they aren't severly bottoming out.

I REST MY CASE

Viscous skin friction is overrated...
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top