ECUflash Evoscan + 95 Eclipse = ?

[Sublime_06]

Can anyone confirm (before I spend money on a cable and the evoscan software) that the program does infact work with 95 Eclipse?

If it does infact work, what kind of samples/sec are people getting? I have a pocketlogger ATM but this program looks like it has a lot more to offer in terms of logging.

 

[jrohner]

Yes it works; I've used it on two 95 EPROM ECU's. The logging rate is about 6-10 samples per second.

 

[hediki12]

yea i run the same logger.. and its slow... but it does the trick better than nothing right. and then you can do a evo 8 ecu conversion or a 98/99 ecu conversion and i think the sample rates sy rocket to around 70/sec if i read correctly.... w/ such slow logging it wont result in the best or most precise tune.

 

[_Madman_]

I tried to log few older model year cars at our club and the logger simply refused to connect. I have a Tectrix 1.3 cable with pin 9 absent.

 

[Sublime_06]

yea i run the same logger.. and its slow... but it does the trick better than nothing right. and then you can do a evo 8 ecu conversion or a 98/99 ecu conversion and i think the sample rates sy rocket to around 70/sec if i read correctly.... w/ such slow logging it wont result in the best or most precise tune.

Hey man I though I read somewhere that you picked up an evo8 ecu? Did you end up installing it? If so how did the swap go? Does it run okay?

I have a 95 aswell and I am unsure about going to the evo8 ecu with the inverted cas. Is it that big of a problem?

Thanks,
Chris.

 

[VPrime]

I have logged 2 95's with evoscan...

Side note:
Does any one know how evo scan compares to a palm logger (sample wise/ speed wise)?