definitiveno
15+ Year Contributor
- 1,237
- 8
- Sep 8, 2004
-
Reno/Sacramento,
California
what advantages do stand alone units (motec, aem, etc) have over dsmlink as far as fuel and timing adjustments?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
If you have the time could you expand on each of these, comparing the differences of each system (stand alone vs dsmlink) if not it's okay I can search.MNGSX said:Closed loop wideband o2 feedback
More resolution in the fuel map... More points in the table for RPM and load...
Full control of everything.
N20 fuel enrich thru the main injectors.
More coil drivers so you can run 4 individual coils.. COP..
There are so many advantages...
The DSM link is a bang for buck system... A mild to moderate car would do well on one..
A standalone is harder to setup but in the right hands with a wideband o2 simply phenominal..
MNGSX said:Closed loop wideband o2 feedback
1. More resolution in the fuel map... More points in the table for RPM and load...
2. Full control of everything.
3. N20 fuel enrich thru the main injectors.
4. More coil drivers so you can run 4 individual coils.. COP..
5. There are so many advantages...
The DSM link is a bang for buck system... A mild to moderate car would do well on one..
A standalone is harder to setup but in the right hands with a wideband o2 simply phenominal..
1. Not needed with a maf based system
2. Often a draw back to stand alones. Everything has to be set up.
3. Dsmlink offers N2O control and separate fuel tables
4. Can certainly run COP with dsmlink
5. There are so many draw backs to a stand alone
Your on the right track then, I was just tryin to figure out what I was missing out on with link and decide if it would be worth it to spend another 300 or so on full ems.MNGSX said:1. Not everyone wants to keep MAF..
2. Base maps are already setup on AEM.. Get fancy later once you have learned
3. Thats kool but can it do multi stage N20, progressive or staged injection?
4. Yes but not with one dedicated coil driver per coil...
5. There are so many limitations to link.. The draw backs on stand alones are really only cost and a little more difficult setup.. Not too dificult if you understand it all but for those who dont yes its harder...
Still missing closed loop wideband... More control of things like cold start enrich... For E85 peeps...
The thread was advantages to standalones.. Not advantages to link.... If someone were to ask what the pros of link over a standalone I would have listed your points.. I admit its a great product... Other things exist because some need them.
Where did I say that?iwantawd said:you were considering a standalone and keeping the maf setup?

road race engineering will be tuning my car initially so, it's really not an immediate issue weather I understand the software or not. I pick up fast on that type of thing though, I would not be afraid to get because give me a few weeks of working with it and reading and I will figure out my way around.92tealTSI said:If you have to ask, then get DSMLink, that is all you will EVER need, trust me
definitiveno said:and decide if it would be worth it to spend another 300 or so on full ems.
No, maybe I did. I thought I had seen some engine management selling for 1200 or so before, I havn't really looked very far into it though........iwantawd said:dsmlink + 300 or so does not equal ems + map setup. maybe i missed something?