exedy cerametallic vs act 2100

[FUNWHEELDRIVE]

95 talon tsi awd. gunna be runing between 300-350whp. wont be seeing to much track mostly just a street car.... what would be a better clutch.
exedy cerametallic vs ACT 2100?
any suggestions/ past exsperiences?

 

[SpawnedX]

Fidanza 3.2 Kevlar

Everyone is going to tell you ACT, for some reason they are loyal to it here, even though a search will show you a huge post of people who had an ACT fail.

http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/hangout/133330-did-your-act-clutch-fail-you-if-so-post-here-12.html

 

[FUNWHEELDRIVE]

ya ive heard about some failures with the exedy aswell. i dont really know what one i want they are both about the same price.... and with a 300-350whp range both clutches could handle it.
anyone have some on hand experience who has used both clutches?
thanks

 

[Terrancegst]

I would say go with the exedy cerametallic over ACT havent done research on Fidanza 3.2 Kevlar

 

[99gst_racer]

<----- My dyno numbers where on a ACT 2100. It held like a champ. After using it for 3-4 years, I sold it to a buddy who installed it in a DD 2G. It's still going strong as far as I know. I have nothing but good things to say about it.

I have no experience with the Exedy Cerametallic, so I cannot comment. I just installed a Fidanza 3.2 in my roommate's 2G this summer, but he hasn't driven the car yet, so I can't comment on that one yet either. But I do expect good things from it. My Fidanza 4.3 held great this summer, so his 3.2 should work fine for his 18G car.

 

[Dsmj89]

If act's fail olot why do so many people use it then ? All my friends that have upgraded their clutches all go with act. Hmm...