Junk wideband kit????

[Coder24]

http://www.14point7.com/JAW/JAW.htm

 

[Bcoy]

Woah I have never seen those before. Personally I would stick with namebrand. I know you dont want to spend much but your probably going to get what you pay for. It's worth a try I guess...but be warned, a good wideband for $90 is very unlikely. I would still suggest going all out and getting PLX..its the best wideband and it is also the cheapest.

 

[burnnxs]

Woah I have never seen those before. Personally I would stick with namebrand. I know you dont want to spend much but your probably going to get what you pay for. It's worth a try I guess...but be warned, a good wideband for $90 is very unlikely. I would still suggest going all out and getting PLX..its the best wideband and it is also the cheapest.

kids
read this.

DIYEFI.org Forum - View topic - Open Source Wideband Display

I'm sick of overpriced parts, from now on I either make my own or risk and learn.

 

[ArticNemesis]

kids
read this.

DIYEFI.org Forum - View topic - Open Source Wideband Display

I'm sick of overpriced parts, from now on I either make my own or risk and learn.

Which is all well and fine, if all you want is a display that isn't even all that easy on the eyes.

Myself, I'd rather fork out the ~ $200 for a wideband that is loggable, able to narrowband simulate, and even has an eye-candy display. Not to mention innovate's forums full of troubleshooting and/or tech discussions on it.

[edit]

And way to bring a 2.5 year old thread back.

 

[burnnxs]

Which is all well and fine, if all you want is a display that isn't even all that easy on the eyes.

Myself, I'd rather fork out the ~ $200 for a wideband that is loggable, able to narrowband simulate, and even has an eye-candy display. Not to mention innovate's forums full of troubleshooting and/or tech discussions on it.

[edit]

And way to bring a 2.5 year old thread back.

I have being know to dig way back on graves and always will keep on doing it if different good input is needed in a subject.
That's what the search button is for princess.

 

[chinola69]

yeah I agree

 

[joegamma1]

Which is all well and fine, if all you want is a display that isn't even all that easy on the eyes.

Myself, I'd rather fork out the ~ $200 for a wideband that is loggable, able to narrowband simulate, and even has an eye-candy display. Not to mention innovate's forums full of troubleshooting and/or tech discussions on it.

[edit]

And way to bring a 2.5 year old thread back.

If you would rather fork over the $200, then why would you even open a post that is titled "junk wideband" at all?
Not to mentioned you totally missed the point of someone else posting a cheap wideband alternative to said $200 kit in a two and a half year old thread just in case someone searches for and finds this thread and it actually helps them find a cheap wideband option. (some of the words contained in the last paragraph may have been for future searches)

ArcticNemesis; thanks for adding to this site. (sarcasm)

burnnxs; thanks for adding to this site. (not sarcasm)

 

[tkelly27]

It's a bummer when a $50 wideband kit cooks a $60 sensor. I've had two JAW's, the original and a version between the original and the one that's out now. I'm not sure if they've resolved the issues yet, I've been too happy with my LC-1. The JAW original came pre-assembled by Alan, so it wasn't my doing that cooked the sensor.

I kept the JAW for logging cars that don't have dataloggers like anything with a carb, my dodges, and whatever else i can dig up. It can be a powerful tool, but I don't have the $ to blow on electronic experiments and or engines.

The NAW OEM seems to be pretty cool. I'd mess with it, on someone else's dime.

If you want a trouble free, set it and forget it wideband, it's impossible to go wrong with a LC-1. If you want a lot more gadgets for less money, give the JAW, NAW, or whatever they call 'em now a try.