The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Extremepsi vs FP Intakes

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

my98GST

15+ Year Contributor
1,045
21
Jun 1, 2005
Cleveland, Tennessee
I have a SCM 3132E, I also have an Injen "3inch" intake but as we all know it bottles down to 2.25" to the turbo intake...

My question is what would be more beneficial to me? The 4" of FP or the EPSI 3"

I'm afraid that the 3" would be too constrictive, but the 4" would have too much room inside of the tube to slow down the velocity of the air intake.. Could someone clairify this for me?
 
With the FP, I noticed it didn't have some of the Vac. Bungs like the stock and my engine pipe has... Is that going to be a problem?
 
One is from the charcoal canister (under your battery) and the other is from the valve cover. You can get a catchcan and route them there or leave them open.
 
Not sure if I still have the charcoal canister underneath the battery.... But I do know that the one that was on the front left isn't there..
 
Not sure if I still have the charcoal canister underneath the battery.... But I do know that the one that was on the front left isn't there..

The charcoal canister was located under the battery for the 95-96 model years. After that it moved to the front of the car. Venting it as well as the breather off the VC will have no ill effects on your car. The FP intake is a nice piece.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top