Stock Josh
20+ Year Contributor
- 271
- 1
- Dec 19, 2002
Im not sure if this should be here or in track talk.
I dont necessarily have one question, but wish to start a discussion per say. The topic is ET in realtion to MPH. For the sake of the discussion it is pertaining to AWD cars only. I see certain cars that ET 12.5 at 107 mph. Great ET for the mph. 60 foot of 1.8 to 1.7. Then there is my car. High 1.8 short times, but an ET of 12.5's @ 112. This MPH is "high", so to speak, for the ET. What I'm getting at is, what have you found that effects this in YOUR situations, and what did you do to counter it. I'm hoping some of you experienced this and found certain factors were leading to the high mph but poor ET. I realize the short time is a factor, and I feel that 1.7's should be closer to what I should aim for. The car has trouble hooking up due to huge weight transfer off the front tires. Im thinking I could hole shot a tenth or so harder if I can eliminate the weight transfer. But I feel I would still be missing 3 tenths. Ive eliminated lag between shifts, the car had a poor tune and used to lag between shifts, and would run 12.9's at 112. But at this point Im somewhat stumped.
Thanks for any input.
Josh
I dont necessarily have one question, but wish to start a discussion per say. The topic is ET in realtion to MPH. For the sake of the discussion it is pertaining to AWD cars only. I see certain cars that ET 12.5 at 107 mph. Great ET for the mph. 60 foot of 1.8 to 1.7. Then there is my car. High 1.8 short times, but an ET of 12.5's @ 112. This MPH is "high", so to speak, for the ET. What I'm getting at is, what have you found that effects this in YOUR situations, and what did you do to counter it. I'm hoping some of you experienced this and found certain factors were leading to the high mph but poor ET. I realize the short time is a factor, and I feel that 1.7's should be closer to what I should aim for. The car has trouble hooking up due to huge weight transfer off the front tires. Im thinking I could hole shot a tenth or so harder if I can eliminate the weight transfer. But I feel I would still be missing 3 tenths. Ive eliminated lag between shifts, the car had a poor tune and used to lag between shifts, and would run 12.9's at 112. But at this point Im somewhat stumped.
Thanks for any input.
Josh

.
. Re-adjusting my driving style to not lifting gave me 11.4-11.5 @ 121-123 with otherwise the same gear shifts. This still was not perfect, but as good as I could do on that huge turbo with out N20.
I did have stock suspension at the time and spinning in first and getting squirly in second was an issue. It comes down to what GRNDSM said basically. Even though I do have a relatively small turbo (big16g) it would still loose spool in between shifts when i lifted. My tranny is very delicate and I didnt want to "no lift shift" as I was scared Id brake something. I could get consistent high 1.7-low 1.8 60fts with stock (blown front struts which didnt help weight transfer
) and stock bald tires. I since returned to the track after getting some sportline and agx's (stiffening the crap out of the rear
) with the exact setup except with some stiffer suspension. This really helped my 60ft's and also my 1-2 shift felt much more solid and got less weight transfer between every shift. Im actually getting a new motor in 3 days and will return (even colder now =)) and will try to "no lift shift" to see if my tranny can take it. With all things equal except new motor Ill be shooting for 12.3-12.4.