Hks Konfusion

[1gfromND]

well likeayody i pla to build my motor up so my plan is a big 16g with injectorsand fuel pump etc then i plan to hks the head and im leanin towards 264's with stock but eventually bulletproof springs and retainers etc but i wonderin if the stockers would handle them and if it would be worth it to wait and titanium the head and get 272's?


Thanx Sam

 

[swordfish]

Umm.. .I cant read some of that but yes the stock springs and retainers are fine for the 264's and/or 272's.
jeff

 

[Violater101]

What he said. Not to be rude, but its hard to understand what your saying. If you plan on going to a bigger sized turbo, then a 264/272 combo is what I would go with. The stock springs should be fine. If you stay with a 16g, I would just stick with 264's. You might gain some topend, but lose more under hp under the curve. Check out www.automotosports.com for there cam comparison on a 16g turbo.

 

[autronicDSM]

I got 3 words for you: "Hooked on phonics"

 

[Prodigy]

This may be his secound language....But i know something Hooked on phonics does not fix being and asshole ........

 

[ph3r3d]

stock head can take a 16g.. even a fp30

 

[autronicDSM]

Originally posted by Prodigy
This may be his secound language....But i know something Hooked on phonics does not fix being and asshole ........

Oh I'm sure you know everything, except how to spell!!!

 

[Prodigy]

HA HA HA HA <-------did i spell that right

 

[DSMJim]

Originally posted by Violater101
What he said. Not to be rude, but its hard to understand what your saying. If you plan on going to a bigger sized turbo, then a 264/272 combo is what I would go with. The stock springs should be fine. If you stay with a 16g, I would just stick with 264's. You might gain some topend, but lose more under hp under the curve. Check out www.automotosports.com for there cam comparison on a 16g turbo.

Thanks for that link on the cam test.

I see the Crower and Web just don't seem to compare to the HKS. The 264 vs 272 didn't seem to make any difference, however the power was dropping off with the 16G. Would have been nice to see that test on a car with a larger turbo so I could continue to make power past that point and really see the diff between 264/264 vs. 264/272 vs. 272/272.