eLeCtRoN_bLu
20+ Year Contributor
- 40
- 0
- Apr 14, 2002
I was wondering which one is better : AWD or FWD?? what would you prefer?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Originally posted by eLeCtRoN_bLu
that mister 2 is tight as f@#$
, yeah they dont weigh anything, i love them, they are little fararies(spellimg??) with a touch of rice.Originally posted by GSTspeedracer
AWD all the way !!!!!!!
Once you start cracking the 200+ WGP on FWD it's cool for awhile but, it just sucks spinning all the time.
If they only made an AWD Spyder
Have it converted like (I think his logon is StockSpyder), you've probably seen it on the web some where. It's a thought thats crossed my mind many times since he's done it.


. I'd say around 3k for AWD (used) parts plus you can sell your FWD parts. Most all the fab work is for the rear so if you did everything else yourself I think you could do a full budget conversion for no more then 4k.you know, it may be cheaper to have a AWD converted to a convertible...
Originally posted by DSMotorsport
I can't think of one performance-oreinted thing that fwd is better for....
on a side note I was daydreaming today while lookin at autotrader and I found a 95 GSX and a 95 Talon TSI AWD for only 5000 bucks.. so get this.. what if I was to buy one of these cars and take off all the parts I need, convert my car to AWD with those parts and then put my FWD parts back onto the 5000 car I bought and sold it for like 3000.. figure parts cost you 2gs, its all labor