i kno this is a non turbo forum...but

[MattyD889]

which would all of u guys go with? turbo?....or a supercharger?? and why?

 

[Justin99RST]

turbo...mainly because there isn't and probably never will be a supercharger for the eclipse..

 

[MattyD889]

i thought there was one for the 2g?

 

[mavisky]

ok this belongs in the turbo-nt conversion forum.

 

[Eclipse96Ryder]

there is a supercharger for the 2gnt, it was discussed on here once before....do a search it will come up for sure. I would say turbo...just simply because its been done a lot

 

[dudasd]

Originally posted by Eclipse96Ryder
there is a supercharger for the 2gnt, it was discussed on here once before....do a search it will come up for sure. I would say turbo...just simply because its been done a lot

Do you have some new and groundbreaking news that nobody else knows about?? Or are you refering to the often seen, seldom any info about pic that has been floating around forever now??? Nobody on record makes a SC for our cars, there was the supposed custom job that was done a while back, but there were never any numbers or specs on it.

 

[Defiant]

I prefer how you can let a turbo "sleep", and just bring out the pressure when you want it. And the whole self-supporting way turbos work is just cool as cool.

 

[DSM-ZERO]

Turbo
1, no one makes a SC for our car
2, you can up the boost with a boost controller on a turbo. with a SC you have to change pulleys.
3, I think Turbos look cooler too.

 

[MattyD889]

alrite i guess im gonna look into the turbocharger then