Quote:
Originally Posted by 98spydert
Wow, you are hard to get along with aren't you? Yes, I know that's been posted earlier in the thread. Very observant of you. But now it's all summed up in a single post from start to finish without all of the petty bickering, misused terms, assumptions, and the rest of cluster #### that's made up the 4 pages of this thread.
|
Since you want my opinion that is no summary that is just your experience.
Quote:
There are no originators in this thread. (who said there was? ) If Wiseco makes a shelf part for the combo, you can bet your ass it's been done a few thousand times before. Or else we'd still be calling them with custom piston orders. If you're such an expert on the subject, you should have been helpful in the thread rather than spiteful and argumentative. But this is DSMTuners, isn't it? 
|
Other than that what is your point, I've put up several facts the rest of this quote is irrelevant.
Quote:
And yes, there is a "best rod to stroke ratio." In fact most engine builders agree it's 1.75:1, if the breathing is optimized for the design. And different ratios effect intake and exhaust velocities, dwell times, and other factors of the intake and exhaust strokes which directly affect how efficient the cylinder is at filling with and pushing out it's contents. What type of engineer are you?  This is beginner shit anyone can learn through reading a book. By your fun fact there, you're saying each of these 3 engines I described could be bolted under the same head in the same car and all produce the exact same VE? 
|
No, there isn't a best rod to stroke ratio, if you think there is prove it. I'm not asking for your irrelevant 2 cents like you just typed
just proof come back with the relative data.