MarkAngelo05
15+ Year Contributor
- 201
- 2
- Nov 7, 2006
-
Pearl City,
Hawaii
Hi!
Okay, the 2nd Gen ECU is known to pull timing when IAT's are above 84 degrees. I know for sure that when you install a MAFT, it actually "SIMULATES" a CONSTANT 80 Degrees IAT, since the IAT sensor in not built in to the MAF unlike the stock MAS.
Here in Hawaii, it is almost impossible for me to have IAT's lower than 84 degrees, specially before the turbo and intercooler. I've made several mods by fabricating a partition to help prevent intake of hot Engine bay air. This pretty much directs airflow through the HOLE where the stock Upper Intercooler Piping used to go through. This dramatically decreased IAT's from 110+ during the day to about 90 degrees during the day. Yet this is still causing me a 1 degree loss in timing because it's above 84 degrees.
Has anybody ever measured approximately how much hotter the turbo heats the Air before it goes through the intercooler? Would it have made more sense if the IAT sensor was located in the intake manifold? Since the intercooler (depending on efficiency) would cool the air and ofcourse be different from the IAT reading from the MAS..??
Maybe I am getting too into this. Bottom line is, should I also simulate IAT's from the MAS to 80 degrees like how the MAFT does. Most of us that have Upgraded Front Mount intercoolers would throw off the factory "calculations" anyway, which would prove the factory IAT readings would cause the ECU to inaccurately calculate due to our Large front mounts cooling the intake charge to near ambient temperatures.
Any inputs?
Here is the partition mod that effectively dropped my IAT's atleast 20 degrees!
Thanks!
Mark
Okay, the 2nd Gen ECU is known to pull timing when IAT's are above 84 degrees. I know for sure that when you install a MAFT, it actually "SIMULATES" a CONSTANT 80 Degrees IAT, since the IAT sensor in not built in to the MAF unlike the stock MAS.
Here in Hawaii, it is almost impossible for me to have IAT's lower than 84 degrees, specially before the turbo and intercooler. I've made several mods by fabricating a partition to help prevent intake of hot Engine bay air. This pretty much directs airflow through the HOLE where the stock Upper Intercooler Piping used to go through. This dramatically decreased IAT's from 110+ during the day to about 90 degrees during the day. Yet this is still causing me a 1 degree loss in timing because it's above 84 degrees.
Has anybody ever measured approximately how much hotter the turbo heats the Air before it goes through the intercooler? Would it have made more sense if the IAT sensor was located in the intake manifold? Since the intercooler (depending on efficiency) would cool the air and ofcourse be different from the IAT reading from the MAS..??
Maybe I am getting too into this. Bottom line is, should I also simulate IAT's from the MAS to 80 degrees like how the MAFT does. Most of us that have Upgraded Front Mount intercoolers would throw off the factory "calculations" anyway, which would prove the factory IAT readings would cause the ECU to inaccurately calculate due to our Large front mounts cooling the intake charge to near ambient temperatures.
Any inputs?
Here is the partition mod that effectively dropped my IAT's atleast 20 degrees!
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
Thanks!
Mark
Attachments
You must be registered for see attachments list
The car feels like a pig.
.. I don't wanna mess with the extra stuff. It's a darn good idea though.. but still won't change the ECU seeing high Intake temps and pulling 1 degree timing regardless. I'm going to develop something that I will pass around... It's gonna be either a remote temp sensor that goes on the intake manifold, or an something...so it's more accurate.