01-03-2008, 11:55 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: copely, Ohio
Region: Midwest
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 176
Reputation:
|
manual computer swap in an auto and running like crap
my winter beater is a 91 awd auto. i had a few extra parts laying around so i up graded it. swaped a 14b, 450s and an evo fmic into it and the car ran great. 13.7 @ 102. not bad for nothing really done to it. unforntinetly the ecu melted. yay not the first time its happened to me, and i couldnt find an auto ecu. so i had a manuel 1g ecu , swapped it in and the car started up again. but now its running really weird and hitting fuel cut at anything over 7 lbs.  (no fun). from what ive read on other threads the only difference was the injector size and the car would run fine with them. Am i missing somthing? im hoping theres somthing stupid im not thinking about... any help would be great.... thanks
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-03-2008, 12:18 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Non-Supporting Vendor
Slowboy Racing
From: Butler/Indiana, Pennsylvania
Region: Tri State
Registered: Feb 2007
Posts: 640
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacethisTSI
my winter beater is a 91 awd auto. i had a few extra parts laying around so i up graded it. swaped a 14b, 450s and an evo fmic into it and the car ran great. 13.7 @ 102. not bad for nothing really done to it. unforntinetly the ecu melted. yay not the first time its happened to me, and i couldnt find an auto ecu. so i had a manuel 1g ecu , swapped it in and the car started up again. but now its running really weird and hitting fuel cut at anything over 7 lbs.  (no fun). from what ive read on other threads the only difference was the injector size and the car would run fine with them. Am i missing somthing? im hoping theres somthing stupid im not thinking about... any help would be great.... thanks
|
What year DSM is the ECU from?
Joe
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-03-2008, 12:18 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Greensburg, Pennsylvania
Region: Tri State
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 680
Reputation: 
|
The automatic ecu is for 390cc injectors I do believe, not 450s.
____________________________
-Erik
|
|
Online
|
|
01-03-2008, 12:27 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: copely, Ohio
Region: Midwest
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 176
Reputation:
|
i know the auto ecu is for 390s but the car ran amazing with the 450s so i didnt worry about it. the ecu is from another 91 laser awd i have laying around
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-03-2008, 12:35 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Greensburg, Pennsylvania
Region: Tri State
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 680
Reputation: 
|
Yeah, but have you tried putting the 390's back in to see if it runs good?
The manual ecu isn't putting as much fuel through the same injectors and therefor you may be running leaner than with the 450 injectors and auto ecu. But check for boost leasts if it's hitting fuel cut at 7 lbs. Stock everything shouldn't be fuel cutting though.
____________________________
-Erik
|
|
Online
|
|
01-03-2008, 12:45 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Canton, Ohio
Region: Tri State
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 148
Reputation:
|
I did the exact same thing(minus front mount and turbo change)and mine has been running great so far. Did that in September.I did,however,buy a manual tranny fpr. It's about 6-8 psi lower than the stock auto fpr.
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-03-2008, 01:08 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: copely, Ohio
Region: Midwest
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 176
Reputation:
|
no boost leaks, car hasent changed since the ecu was changed. but it has been running leaner
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-03-2008, 01:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Hendersonville, North Carolina
Region: Southeast
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,433
Reputation:
|
Are you sure it's fuel cut?
____________________________
Gerald.
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-03-2008, 08:35 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: copely, Ohio
Region: Midwest
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 176
Reputation:
|
yes im sure its fuel cut  .ive had enough of these cars to know what it is
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-05-2008, 07:03 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Oliver, B.C., Canada
Region: Western Canada
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 448
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by housegsx
Yeah, but have you tried putting the 390's back in to see if it runs good?
The manual ecu isn't putting as much fuel through the same injectors and therefor you may be running leaner than with the 450 injectors and auto ecu. But check for boost leasts if it's hitting fuel cut at 7 lbs. Stock everything shouldn't be fuel cutting though.
|
He has 450's in there, like he stated.
Is the ECU you installed a known gooder? There isn't anything your missing since you already have the bigger injectors it should be fine. Mabe the new ECU is bad?
Last edited by GORBS88 : 01-05-2008 at 07:06 PM.
Reason: spelling
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-06-2008, 02:45 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: copely, Ohio
Region: Midwest
Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 176
Reputation:
|
that was my next thought. the ecu is out of a running car but the car in a hack job.
|
|
Offline
|
|
01-06-2008, 04:42 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member
From: Ludington, Michigan
Region: Midwest
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 281
Reputation:
|
The Base fuel pressure on a AT is higher then on MT cars, but it should not hurt...
If you swapped 450cc's and a 14B then you got a few things you need to check:
1.Can you confirm that the 'new ecu' is good??got a buddy??try it in his car...
2.Does your wastegate is stuck closed??rusted??or broken/bent arm???
3.Does your whatever boost controler you use works fine??any boost leaks??
4.A logger is a must and it would tell you what's really going on!
How do you know you are runing rich/lean?? Got a gauge?? OR???What have you tested???
Be specific so we can narrow it down!
____________________________
Nothing will outlast a OM617! 389k and counting!
|
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 PM.
|