Welcome to DSMtuners - The Talon, Laser, and Eclipse performance enthusiast resource



















Login



See All DSMtuners Supporting Vendors
Go Back   DSMtuners > DSM Forums > DSM Tech > Cylinder Head & Short Block > Stroker Tech

Stroker Tech 4G63 stroker discussions - 2.1L, 2.2L, 2.3L, 2.4L, etc.

Reply
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-23-2008, 02:01 PM Show Printable Version Show Printable Version   Email this Post to a Friend Email this Post      #1 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
ProjectTalon92's Avatar
From: Bonner Springs, Kansas
Registered: Sep 2007
Tech Posts: 69
Classifieds Rating: 0
Reputation: ProjectTalon92 is an unknown
102mm Crank or 100mm Crank?

On a previous thread, i was in a conversation with another member and he said that i shouldn't go with a 102mm stroker crank? now i'm not sure, but i wouldn't think that would make that much of a difference. Would 2mm make a whole lot of difference when decideing which crank i should buy? and does everyone else that wouldn't be a good idea to buy a 102mm stroker crank?



Reply With Quote
Advertisement


To browse the forums without the advertisements above, Login/Register
Old 02-23-2008, 02:24 PM Show Printable Version Show Printable Version   Email this Post to a Friend Email this Post      #2 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
TunaTalon's Avatar
From: Dittmer, Missouri
Registered: Oct 2007
Tech Posts: 522
Classifieds Rating: 0
Reputation: TunaTalon is extremely helpful and trustworthyTunaTalon is extremely helpful and trustworthy
See Displacement for various combinations of bore and stroke for a table of displacements for various bore and stroke combinations.

The 102mm stroke crankshaft will need the taller block of the 4G64 to fit and then will need stroker pistons and custom 155mm rods.

Compared to the 100mm crank in a 4G64 with stock bore you will gain only about 2% more displacement. Compared to the 100mm stroke you will lose only about 60 RPM for max piston acceleration (as referenced to the 2.0L)

The beauty of tuner cars is that everyone can build up a car to their own taste. For my taste the 102mm crank adds a lot of sour complications for very little sweet torque.


____________________________
Maurice G.
98 TSI Stroked and Stalled

Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 02:58 PM Show Printable Version Show Printable Version   Email this Post to a Friend Email this Post      #3 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
ProjectTalon92's Avatar
From: Bonner Springs, Kansas
Registered: Sep 2007
Tech Posts: 69
Classifieds Rating: 0
Reputation: ProjectTalon92 is an unknown
that's a good way to look at it. i know that i'm going with an aftermarket crank. i know i can get a OEM 2.4L crank easy, but for my goals i'm not sure it will hold up. and there are numerous stroker cranks that i have been looking at. So all in all a 100mm crank would be better over all? one of the cranks i have been looking at is an eagle 100mm crank shaft.

Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 07:44 AM Show Printable Version Show Printable Version   Email this Post to a Friend Email this Post      #4 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
TunaTalon's Avatar
From: Dittmer, Missouri
Registered: Oct 2007
Tech Posts: 522
Classifieds Rating: 0
Reputation: TunaTalon is extremely helpful and trustworthyTunaTalon is extremely helpful and trustworthy
The 100mm crank is the “tried and true” solution. The 102 mm stroke will need either custom rods or custom pistons. You post mentioned the crank only but there are kits on the market that handle the different rods and pistons for strokes other than 88mm or 100mm. Purchasing a kit can pass off some the complexities to the vendor but there is still very little to torque gain with the extra 2mm stroke.

For what it’s worth, I have a 100mm Eagle crank in my Talon.


____________________________
Maurice G.
98 TSI Stroked and Stalled

Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 07:54 AM Show Printable Version Show Printable Version   Email this Post to a Friend Email this Post      #5 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 94 SHO
From: Morgantown, West Virginia
Registered: Jan 2006
Tech Posts: 1,455
Photos: 6
Classifieds Rating: 0
Reputation: delta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening todelta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening todelta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening todelta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening to
Brian Crower makes stroker kits for both the 4G63 and 4g64. The 102mm crank is for the 4G63.


____________________________
Zack H.
View photos of this member's car 

Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 02:14 PM Show Printable Version Show Printable Version   Email this Post to a Friend Email this Post      #6 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
From: Raleigh, North Carolina
Registered: Feb 2006
Tech Posts: 223
Photos: 3
Classifieds Rating: 1
Reputation: 98gsspy is an unknown
The 102mm crank is for the 4g64.
View photos of this member's car 

Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2008, 03:49 PM Show Printable Version Show Printable Version   Email this Post to a Friend Email this Post      #7 (permalink)
Proven Member
 
Car: 94 SHO
From: Morgantown, West Virginia
Registered: Jan 2006
Tech Posts: 1,455
Photos: 6
Classifieds Rating: 0
Reputation: delta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening todelta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening todelta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening todelta448 is an experienced, knowledgeable member worth listening to
I don't have personal experience with the Crower kit, but their site states the 102mm crank is intended to be used on the 4G63. I'd imagine their kit uses the maximum stroke possible in a 2.0 block. No doubt it would likely have less clearance problems on a 4G64 however...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianCrower.com
The BC stroker kit for the Mitsubishi 4G63 engine platform incorporates a 102mm stroke, 7 bolt crank. Depending on bore size that you decide, the BC kit will take you up to a 2.4L with 86mm bore.
I think that it probably doesn't matter whether you use a stock 100mm 4G64 crank when stroking a 4G63 over the 102mm, although the BC crank is likely a higher quality. If you want max displacement most people would just skip right on over to the 4G64 and build it instead.


____________________________
Zack H.
View photos of this member's car 

Reply With Quote
Reply


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

 

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crank Shaft & Crank Pulley Q. Is this bad? (picture included) xstriderx Newbie Forum 18 02-28-2008 03:49 PM
Eagle 7bolt 100mm stroker crank? twinkiemobile Stroker Tech 3 07-07-2007 07:35 PM
The elusive 100mm crank Caithness Cylinder Head & Short Block 10 12-15-2006 01:44 PM
Crank Pully not spinning. Crank pulley serperation?? BLUEBLOTCH The Hangout 3 07-22-2006 07:52 AM
4g64 crank & 4g63 crank gear, do they work ? TargeT Cylinder Head & Short Block 3 09-25-2004 02:07 AM



» Recent Build Entries
Night 2
by: knochgoon24

Hello spring
by: MMS40

Project 9's No compromise update!!
by: Slippi84

Night 1
by: knochgoon24

Prelude
by: knochgoon24
» Latest Gallery Photo
User calan



» Current Poll
What kind of build are you working on?
Street/Strip - 79.53%
307 Votes
Full Drag Race - 4.15%
16 Votes
Track Day/Time Trials - 4.66%
18 Votes
Full Road Race - 5.18%
20 Votes
Autocross - 5.96%
23 Votes
Dyno Queen - 0.52%
2 Votes
Total Votes: 386
You may not vote on this poll.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS CMPS v3.2.1

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:42 PM.

DSM Forums | Pontiac Solstice/Saturn Sky Forums

© 2009 SPEEDtuners Network, LLC All Rights Reserved

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2