Chrono
20+ Year Contributor
- 142
- 7
- Dec 12, 2002
-
Calgary,
Just thinking what your guys thoughts on are from me going from my big 16 to a PTE .60 trim....like what advantages other then getting more HP...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Originally posted by Mike 99GSX
Update your profile with your current mods and it would be easier to chime in.
Toss that bad boy on witcha 450cc's and stock exhaust 

Originally posted by 11secDSM
...I hope you have the supporting mods to support the PTE 60 trim. I personally just upgraded to the PTE 60-1 from a Buschur big 16g and it's a HUGE turbo. It's got a bit of lag (nothing I can't deal with) but the top end is incredible!! Depending on what you are expecting to get out of it I might reconsider your choice. I wanted a turbo that had a lot of top end potential...if you want something that spools up quick and still has a decent top end I'd look into a 50 trim or something similar. The AGP RS49 is an awesome turbo for something like that along with the PTE 50 trim. Just my 2cents. Peace.

Originally posted by headrec*
Get ready for some SERIOUS LAG!

Originally posted by Groomz
Big difference between a 60-1 and a 60 trim. A 60 trim turbo such as the PTE will support maybe around 60-80 more horsepower than a 50 trim. I plan on getting the 60 trim for more top end power. Who needs a drag strip when you have an empty highway???![]()
I was actually planning on a 60 trim but now that you said that it makes way more sense to have a 50 trim turbo for the street.Originally posted by ItsStockOfficer
My God, theres such bullshit in this thread....do you guys distill it or does it occur this pure in nature? 60 trims make 50 less hp huh? Well, you know, tuning might have a thing or 2 to do ith that sort of thing....same with the 60-1, which I might add made my mildly modded stock motor, safc tuned car trap 90 in the eigth and 112 in the qaurter on 91 octane, full weight, 20 psi.....and bolt on to bolt on was faster then a 20g, 50 or 60 trim....and over 120 on race gas.
60-1 have trapped 144 MPH, no nitrous. They will be faster then a 50 or 60 trim at any boost level....just like a 60 trim, tuning for tuning, beat a 50 trim.
Or should the people with honda's makeing 500 wheel hp at 18 PSI on 60-1's change to 50 trims....maybe someone should tell them!
Originally posted by ItsStockOfficer
I never claimed it was properly tuned, but a full weight 20g powered awd car is never going to trap 120 on 91 octane with a stock engine and safc tuned 550's. No way, no how. I have used both, back to back, the 60-1 was faster by about 3 mph on pump and 6-7 on race gas....
Look at what all the Red, BR57 and real 60-1 cars do on pump properly tuned, they ####ing own 20g's and 50 trim's....and lok outsie of dsm's into communitys where 18 psi is a ton....they use 60-1 and still make 100 more whp
) A 50 trim type turbo is going to give almost everyone here way more turbo than they'll ever need and plenty of driveability. A 60-1 is not going to beat a 50 trim turbo at 20 PSI on pump gas. 25+PSI on C16 would be a different story though
Originally posted by Groomz
Unless you want to argue that a huge slow spooling turbo is better for the street.![]()
Originally posted by jdmawd
How about a 52 lb/min ball bearing GT37You must be logged in to view this image or video.
..i'll take a GT35R though