dsm-onster
DSM Wiseman
- 8,592
- 130
- Jul 11, 2004
-
Bloxom,
Virginia
I'm bringing this out to the public forum from PMs because I think it prbably woul be a good topic to discuss... Especially for those considering a performance turbo header beyond an EVO3 manifold
He's retarded. Backpressure is the unwanted sideeffect of scavenging. Scavenging is where one pulse leaves behind a vacuum pocket and sucks the next pulse out. The only way to get scavenging is to have a tube or pipe that is a certain diameter to match pulse frequency. Once the rpms move into the range that the exhaust pipe diameter/length is tuned to the back pressure goes away for the most part. And, at this point, the engine VE goes up and consequently more power is generated. A 3" exhaust pipe is tuned to 7-10,000 rpms (or exhaust pulse frequency). Unfortunately, a pipe with any diameter other than infinite has restrictive surface tension on the inside walls this adds to back pressure even when the exhuast is tuned to the rpm range you are driving in.
None of this applies to a turbo engine after the turbine blade. Before the blade (exhaust mani), scavenging has been proven to give a marginally benificial increase in high horsepower applications. But you won't get much or any gain going to a turbular tuned turbo header with an EVO3. Stock exhaust manis have gotten guys into the 9s.
After the turbine blade, the pulses are chopped up to almost a constant flow so there is no way to create a scavenging affect. Therefore, one would want to reduce the backpressure to 0. A turbo works on the premise of differing pressures. If you have 3 bar in the exhaust mani (before the turbine blade) and 1 bar in the exhaust pipe then there 2 bar difference is doing the work spinning the turbine wheel. Then if you remove the 1 bar in the exhaust pipe (0 backpressure), you now have 3 bar doing the work over the turbine wheel. 50% more work!!! This is why 3 inch exhaust on a little 4 cylinder turbo engine does so well. Spool up time is DRAMATICALLY enhanced. The negative sideeffect to having a turbo is the 30-50psi of back pressure it exerts on the exhaust gasses trying to exit cylinder. But that negative effect of the backpressure is worth it once the turbo has begun to spool.
WTF So his class in thermodynamics and fluids displacement really showed him that pressure opposing the flow increases flow
Jester, respond on here. This will get some experts in here to pick their brains. . .
So, guys. It's been 7 years since my Thermodynamics class and materials chemistry class in college... Am I on the right path here?
the_jester said:i dont know if this [guy] is still on here but i just checked my pm's from way back when i used to come on this site and found this this is after i posted on some thread:
silver2gst said:backpressure
actaully your vary wrong my friend ... backpressue is vital in all engines, you have never taken any mechianical classes i assume or gone into any sort of VE theory. In a turbocharged engine the turbo itself is a huge restriction and provides backpressure, too much at that. We have a pressurized intake and so want to .. well i won't explain about pressure diffrentials, you wouldn't understand. A n/a engine has no turbo so the diameter of the pipe directly controls backpressure. you really should not just yell out "thats the stupiest thing ever" cause to those of us that really know engines your the only one that looks like the stupist one ever... sorry! BUT STOP ACTING LIKE A KID.
BTW stay on tuners, don't ever go to DSMtalk .. you would get mualed.
what a [guy]. i know about VE obviously he doesn understand VE. i should start another thread on it and see if he shows up.
He's retarded. Backpressure is the unwanted sideeffect of scavenging. Scavenging is where one pulse leaves behind a vacuum pocket and sucks the next pulse out. The only way to get scavenging is to have a tube or pipe that is a certain diameter to match pulse frequency. Once the rpms move into the range that the exhaust pipe diameter/length is tuned to the back pressure goes away for the most part. And, at this point, the engine VE goes up and consequently more power is generated. A 3" exhaust pipe is tuned to 7-10,000 rpms (or exhaust pulse frequency). Unfortunately, a pipe with any diameter other than infinite has restrictive surface tension on the inside walls this adds to back pressure even when the exhuast is tuned to the rpm range you are driving in.
None of this applies to a turbo engine after the turbine blade. Before the blade (exhaust mani), scavenging has been proven to give a marginally benificial increase in high horsepower applications. But you won't get much or any gain going to a turbular tuned turbo header with an EVO3. Stock exhaust manis have gotten guys into the 9s.
After the turbine blade, the pulses are chopped up to almost a constant flow so there is no way to create a scavenging affect. Therefore, one would want to reduce the backpressure to 0. A turbo works on the premise of differing pressures. If you have 3 bar in the exhaust mani (before the turbine blade) and 1 bar in the exhaust pipe then there 2 bar difference is doing the work spinning the turbine wheel. Then if you remove the 1 bar in the exhaust pipe (0 backpressure), you now have 3 bar doing the work over the turbine wheel. 50% more work!!! This is why 3 inch exhaust on a little 4 cylinder turbo engine does so well. Spool up time is DRAMATICALLY enhanced. The negative sideeffect to having a turbo is the 30-50psi of back pressure it exerts on the exhaust gasses trying to exit cylinder. But that negative effect of the backpressure is worth it once the turbo has begun to spool.
"backpressue is vital in all engines, you have never taken any mechianical classes i assume or gone into any sort of VE theory."
WTF So his class in thermodynamics and fluids displacement really showed him that pressure opposing the flow increases flow
Jester, respond on here. This will get some experts in here to pick their brains. . .
So, guys. It's been 7 years since my Thermodynamics class and materials chemistry class in college... Am I on the right path here?
no, but i have read a ton on this subject and dsm-onster is on point. i geuss it just sounds better coming from someone who took Thermodynamics class and materials chemistry class in college