bmxfelon420
15+ Year Contributor
- 652
- 62
- Sep 6, 2005
-
Napoleon,
Ohio
Hey simple question I couldnt find an answer to directly, so I thought i'd check here. It is my understanding that MafRaw is the actual signal provided by the Maf cable, and Maf is the value given after compensation. So in relation to a GM MAF, is it correct to say that the MAFraw is the value the ECMlink cable is giving, and MAF is the "Mitsubishi" value of it after compensation is applied? I'm just trying to understand whether the MAFraw of a GM MAF will be comparable to a Mitsu, or whether the huge difference I'm seeing is just the compensation values of it being applied at any given place. I did see on the ECMlink wiki that the value seen in the log is not the rea. properly.