denniegst
15+ Year Contributor
- 292
- 3
- Sep 13, 2004
-
san jose,
California
So whats the scoop on the IS300? My friend wants to get one and she heard they needed alot of work done on them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Raph said:is 300.. sweet catr, esp in dark grey or white.
buy it, turbo it, nice alternative to a 3 series/a4
www.clubna-t.com will show that you can get a full turbo kit for 2000$ thats pretty damn cheap in my opinion. Also the bottom end is the SAME as a 2jz supra its the heads that are different. same rods, crank, just different pistons because of compression but adding a thicker headgasket solves the compression problem. I am DIEING to find a IS300 in my pricerange, one of the newer ones with the square headlights. FWD is sucking dick...GSX26 said:besides the fact that turbo kits cost about 12 grand when it's all said and done and nets you about 300 whp and a 13 second pass. I guess it's better than no power, but hardly seems worth the amount spent, unless you also swap in supra tt bottom end so you can boost past 7 psi. Oh yeah, you'll also need a supra 6-spd tranny if you plan on making power with those, the stock trannies are shit for holding more power. As far as leaving them stock though, I'll agree with everyone else...they last forever and have no problems. I am looking at getting one of these within the next month. Very sweet car...
zachakagoat said:www.clubna-t.com will show that you can get a full turbo kit for 2000$ thats pretty damn cheap in my opinion. Also the bottom end is the SAME as a 2jz supra its the heads that are different. same rods, crank, just different pistons because of compression but adding a thicker headgasket solves the compression problem. I am DIEING to find a IS300 in my pricerange, one of the newer ones with the square headlights. FWD is sucking dick...
Members of my.is argue that it can't be done for that cheap. Even diy kits aren't that cheap. Then with 2000, what kind of turbo are you getting? A POS probably. And what about fuel management? AFC...don't take the chance on a nice car like that. Standalone is the only way to go, or so the boosted guys say. Also, the bottom end isn't the same as TT supras. Even the exhaust mani stud sequence is different. That's why the supra mani's don't bolt up. Yeah, you could get a thicker hg like 2mm or 3mm. I'm not really arguing or saying you're wrong, but hell, you can't do much with 2000 on a turbo dsm, which is a very cheap car to mod. I too am dying to find one in my range, as soon as I get rid of the DSMs.
JayRolla said:You wouldnt need full standalone for it at all. Ive seen supras lay 700whp with just a SAFC, single turbo. Im pretty sure Greddy would work pretty good in it also. I dont know about the motor internals but I thought the bottom end was the same also. Maybe the crank and rods are the same. I would not expect it to have the same pistons because one is turbo and the other is N/A. The IS300 should have higher compression than the Supra.
Then the guys on eBay could get rich by selling normal taillights.JayRolla said:Man I wish they would have brought the turbo Toyota Alteza to America.
GSX26 said:Members of my.is argue that it can't be done for that cheap. Even diy kits aren't that cheap. Then with 2000, what kind of turbo are you getting? A POS probably. And what about fuel management? AFC...don't take the chance on a nice car like that. Standalone is the only way to go, or so the boosted guys say. Also, the bottom end isn't the same as TT supras. Even the exhaust mani stud sequence is different. That's why the supra mani's don't bolt up. Yeah, you could get a thicker hg like 2mm or 3mm. I'm not really arguing or saying you're wrong, but hell, you can't do much with 2000 on a turbo dsm, which is a very cheap car to mod. I too am dying to find one in my range, as soon as I get rid of the DSMs.
Defiant said:Then the guys on eBay could get rich by selling normal taillights.
zachakagoat said:The exhaust manifold has NOTHING to do with the bottom end of the motor. The exhuast mani bolts to the head just like the DSMs. And don't diss the SAFC just because you chose to go link doesnt mean that power can't be controlled without it. Lots of power was being made before people even HEARD of DSMLink so don't give me that. And the parts for the lexus aren't that bad you just have to know where to look. If people were to go only to the vendors for parts like on the DSM field you would be screwed out of your mind. Vendor prices are unreal. And yes 2000$ could do ALOT for a DSM so saying that that isn't much money is crap too. The only difference in the 2jz-gte bottom end and the 2jz-ge bottom end is the pistons due to the compression difference that they need. A safc would be fine for a turbokit for the lexus and I will probably go with one because I am very confident in my tuning abilities as I have used one on my GST for years.
GSX26 said:Alright, so bottom end is same besides pistons, which matters the most. And as for an afc, yeah it can be done...it's just harder and not as good. Also, what do you think you can do with 2 grand on a dsm and make it FAST? I want to know how you can make a highly modified car with that little of money. And then do that to a n/a car, too.... a decent turbo is near or over 1000. Exhuast systems get very pricey, too. This doesn't even include all the supporting mods, either. FMIC will run you like 600-700 atleast...
zachakagoat said:don't start in on the whole 700$ for a FMIC. Turbo XS has our kits for 230$ and that kit is PROVEN to be better than alot of the competition in the 700$ price range.