- Thread starter
- #26
Abdo4GST
10+ Year Contributor
- 33
- 1
- Aug 31, 2010
-
Murfreesboro,
Tennessee
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yes, I did and sorry misread and thought you had said RC 550's... . But, that is what I ment you need to add the deadtime if using a value like in the ECMlink wiki or else where besides a flowsheet pretty much...
Anyway, Get that wideband addressed and logging right or anything you are doing is going to be negated... .
According to the table in this link, your switching point doesn't match one of the recommended values for an AEM wideband.
v3narrowbandsim [ECMTuning - wiki]
Simplest way for MOST AEM gauges to fine lambda 1 (14.7:1) or the switching point is to simply disconnect the gauges wideband sensor as the gauge with default to The needed value just need to reference the raw voltage in the Log.(first part of my link below) There are a few that don't but with some common sense it's not to hard to figure out.
Any AEM gauge I would go thru the trouble of "calibrating it" Or making sure that the Signal is reading correctly in the logs as a liner wideband and matches. Being they are plagued with grounding issues and rarely output anything that matches the White papers. not to mention not al or ECU input play nice as well.
I won't get to much into the NB sim and all that or placement as that is a whole can of other worms.
But I'll say if you have a front stock o2 leave it unless it's 1000% not feasible. I see too many people run N/b sim. Just to run it and can't figure out all sorts of other issues or get a good start because they are using false reading and wrong switching points.
Most of what I have seen is flawed or has some downsides as methods to get them to line up.
But here is a thread on the Link Forums that I added my $0.02 on and has the method I came up with and use.
ECMTuning User Support Forums
I understand what you are saying.
The method, I describe there in the link just is the most foolproof way I have Other people do it on there own to get me the info I need and takes away any variables the car might add in.
Anyway back on topic I suppose.
I see Nothing for anyone to look at to say... .