TSiBOLO
Proven Member
- 77
- 11
- Aug 6, 2016
-
Milford,
Michigan
Is anyone running these beauties on their 2.0s? Was wanting to run a 6266/6466 comparable version for my 9:1 build this winter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
You bought a FP Super 94. Look around, there should be plenty of info on users running that turbo...although you'll definitely want a different fuel than pump gas if you want the turbo to work well for you.I ended up buying the 95•67 from ArcherFab during his Blackfriday sales. Was curious to know if I would be misusing this turbo on a 9:1-9:5 compression engine. I’m only on 93 currently.
You bought a FP Super 94. Look around, there should be plenty of info on users running that turbo...although you'll definitely want a different fuel than pump gas if you want the turbo to work well for you.
You should have asked this question before you bought the turboI ended up buying the 95•67 from ArcherFab during his Blackfriday sales. Was curious to know if I would be misusing this turbo on a 9:1-9:5 compression engine. I’m only on 93 currently.
I read the xona turbos are Tial branded or made by Tial, maybe my googling failed me but thats what i took from reading online, so they have a nicer CHRA setup but if its based on a FP turbo is there still going to be the same lower quality we see and reliability from the FP name?
And you’re probably right but I thought I could get some opinions now. I had it in my mind that being auto the 9.5:1 would be great to get me through the low rpms faster. But wouldn’t be able to run much boost.You should have asked this question before you bought the turbo
Its a hit and miss thing. Some folks have zero issues and other people have major problems from stsrt to finish and end up going a different brand turbo because of the issues, i read good snd bad things but over the last few years i tend to see more negatives then good. Maybe because people post more abiut bad vs good nowadays i dont know plus if memory is well justin said once abiut the amount of rebuikds he had from FP turbos even being used correctly was quite high,Did I miss a thread on FP not having good quality turbos? I've been running the HTA76 (Xona Rotor DSM 61-56) since 2015 at ~40 psi without one issue. I'm not saying no one has had an issue with a single turbo but wondering where this came about.
You’re going to need a good converter and nitrous to launch with that turbo.Thank you for all the knowledge JusMX. I will switch to e85 then. I bought this turbo because in my mind it would be the last I’d ever need. Doubtfully I will ever max it out. Likewise with the motor build, Manley crank, Manley turbo tuff I-beams and wiseco 1400hds, 625+ head studs, arp main studs and so on.
And you’re probably right but I thought I could get some opinions now. I had it in my mind that being auto the 9.5:1 would be great to get me through the low rpms faster. But wouldn’t be able to run much boost.
You’re going to need a good converter and nitrous to launch with that turbo.
We shall see with testing, but I assume it’s aimed at ultra high flowThanks brother, can’t wait to hit the streets. Also just saw that new UHF turbine wheel on their Instagram. Thinking quicker spoolup?
For those that dont know, Xona is the joint venture company between FP, TiAL and owen development. The MFG happens at tial, and uses FP aero. Xona uses billet stainless Ballbearing center cartrages, journal bearing isnt an option. They also just released a new ULTRA HIGH FLOW turbine design this week that they are saying is a game changer.
Ian, hope you enjoy your turbo and make good power with it! Your top mount manifold is going to be assembled soon!
They basically copied the compressor design and reverse-engineered it to the turbine. It's like clipping half of the blades instead of all of them...I'm in for results but I don't anticipate anything substantial in the flow department as I've been screwing with clipping and lesser-blade-count turbines for years with varying results. At the end of the day a 62mm (or whatever size) hole is going to flow what a 62mm hole will allow.They also just released a new ULTRA HIGH FLOW turbine design this week that they are saying is a game changer!
Whatever. They both use the same compressor anyway- and Super 94 had a 67mm turbine exducer, not a 68mm...unless FP is inventing new names for wheels that already exist again like they did the 71HTA. Seems like they rename the lineup or reinvent the wheel so-to-speak every couple years to add confusion and keep selling products.Also, the 95•67 is not like the super94, it has the smaller gt37 turbine like the hta3794 @JusMX141 the 95•68 is the super94’s replacement.
I believe some are assembled at fp but the actual Machining and development is at tial as far as I knowSo this is not built in fp workshop? But at tial, is that what im reading correctly
if you read on that seemed to have been human error on website discription on michaels part. Also I remember when the super94 came out they discribed it as “it’s like the 3794 went to the gym packing a new big punch” because they changed the turbine size. I remember because I was looking at these turbos myself, and the fact the 67mm turbine would spool slightly quicker then a 68 is what turned me to it over the larger. But we are only talkin 1mm hereThey basically copied the compressor design and reverse-engineered it to the turbine. It's like clipping half of the blades instead of all of them...I'm in for results but I don't anticipate anything substantial in the flow department as I've been screwing with clipping and lesser-blade-count turbines for years with varying results. At the end of the day a 62mm (or whatever size) hole is going to flow what a 62mm hole will allow.
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
Whatever. They both use the same compressor anyway- and Super 94 had a 67mm turbine exducer, not a 68mm...unless FP is inventing new names for wheels that already exist again like they did the 71HTA. Seems like they rename the lineup or reinvent the wheel so-to-speak every couple years to add confusion and keep selling products.