Operate
Proven Member
- 131
- 27
- Mar 28, 2013
-
Tacoma,
Washington
Congratulations! Keltalon is your block filled ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Awesome! it gives me hope!No its not filled.
I do semi-tuning professionalAlso who tunes your car?
I have to look at the logger but I think its around 5700. The turbo is super quick on the spool. I am running a lower gear ratio evo 1 3.909. when the engine was in the fwd with the taller gear I would see full boost around 5400 rpm. Now mine you my full boost is 40psi.Great numbers. I'm thinking about swapping to a 6266 turbo. When do you hit full boost? I wanna get into the 9s. Here's my set up have any recommendations?
10:1 wiseco with Manley rods acl bearings. Stage 3 head. 282 cams. Borg Warner 258rs. Side exit exhaust. Sbr fmic. Dsm translator. Dsmlink v2.5 hks ssqv. Tial 38mm through hood. Punishment t3 exhaust manifold. Alum rad slim fans. Rear mount battery with shutoff switch. 1000cc injectors. Aem can gears. Old school Dejon intake manifold. Act lightweight flywheel and 2900 clutch. Shep stage 3 trans with welded diff. 1inch lower springs. Ss clutch lines welded pedal assembly. Walbro 450. Adjustable fpr. Only main hoop of cage is welded in needs finished have the parts. Have most of interior minus radio. Made 560 at 34 psi. Mitsu metal head gasket and arp l19 studs. Tuned on q16.Has went a best of 10.5.
To be honest i rightfully can't say considering that I haven't been in the 9s. I am definitely going to the track first friday after the 1/2 mile event if i break 9s I will come back with an affirmative answer! I have seen only a few evo guys break nine with the 6266 but have seen plenty do it with a 6466. The 6266 gen2 on my car is rated 900hp so make sure if you are thinking of the 6266 get the gen2 version.Do you think the 6266 with a twin t4 would get me there
I always do both. Most dsmers don't want to subject the 4th gear to the effects of load it is one of the main gears that strip teeth in our trannies.I am wondering why i see lots of "Dyno" numbers being posted in 3rd gear. What is that? When I was running a Dyno at previous job, we were trained to do a Dyno pull in the gear closest to a 1:1 ratio. So, if you have a 5 speed it would be 4th gear, 6 speed it would be in 5th and so on. Can anyone shed light on this? Thanks
At what power level does this become a concern? Just curious...I always do both. Most dsmers don't want to subject the 4th gear to the effects of load it is one of the main gears that strip teeth in our trannies.
Some say 550whp and up I guess it just depends. As far as awd numbers it my be a minute my current clutch has its limits. I wanted to change it before the 1/2 Mile event but decided to turn the boost down instead so I can run the event.At what power level does this become a concern? Just curious...
Also, when are we gonna see some awhp numbers?
I only seen minimal differences between 3rd and 4th. I made 10hp less in 3rd than 4th and about 40 ft lbs torque less in 3rd than 4th. the point is if they post 600 in 3rd they will post more in 4th . This has always been my experience.Then it's not true horsepower numbers then! They are skewed it is not a one to one ratio so therefore Dino numbers are true.
Think thays what he is doing the fwd got wrecked by some careless fool. If I'm correct.Take the monster gst and turn it into a gsx or put your set up in a gsx. You have an awesome car, you do good work. Keep up the good work!
Its not a concern about hurting the dyno it's a concern about breaking the Transmission.It's all a personal choice I guess, but without a 1:1 ratio the numbers aren't accurate. To each his own. Even Midwest street cars runs their Dyno as close to 1:1 even when Dynoing a 1,200 hp truck or a 3,000hp car to give accurate numbers. Dynos are made to take the load that's what they were designed for but, hey what do I know!!
WaI work at a professional transmission shop. If you're breaking stuff you're not building it correctly. Automatics don't have that problem.
Walbro 450 in tank Walbro 255hp inline - 6 from tank to the rail fuel lab fuel filter fic2150cc injectors. 40psi 81% duty cycle.Hey I was wondering what your fuel system set up is I have a 6466 and I'm putting my car back together trying to decided what I should put in fuel system wise.
ThisIts
Its not a concern about hurting the dyno it's a concern about breaking the Transmission.
Alright awesome I have a 450 in tank and 2200 injectors it looked like I'm going to need another fuel pump or a bigger one the 450 alone I'll most likely max out pretty quicklyWa
Walbro 450 in tank Walbro 255hp inline - 6 from tank to the rail fuel lab fuel filter fic2150cc injectors. 40psi 81% duty cycle.
Ita not about how it's built it's the fact that the parts are weak with signififant power. It's like a known thingI work at a professional transmission shop. If you're breaking stuff you're not building it correctly. Automatics don't have that problem.
Ive got a 6466 also ive been fine with single walbro 450 up to 38psi, but it never hurts to add an inline, i wasnt at the same duty cycle as kelvin though. And in on e85@keltalon probably time for a -8 feed to lower that a wee bitAlright awesome I have a 450 in tank and 2200 injectors it looked like I'm going to need another fuel pump or a bigger one the 450 alone I'll most likely max out pretty quickly