The Top DSM Community on the Web

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. Log in to remove most ads.

Please Support STM Tuned
Please Support Rix Racing

Has anyone use a Comp Turbo?

This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

The triple ball bearing format is for durability, not to make it quicker-spooling.

Here are some things to understand about the differences in oiling during operation between a ball bearing and journal bearing turbo:

- Journal bearing turbos need a high flow of oil to support the shaft during operation. While the turbo is in use, the shaft floats on a pillow of oil and doesn't directly-contact the bearings or the housing....if the oil flow is disrupted, bearing and component damage can and will occur.

- Ball bearing turbos require just enough oil to lubricate the bearings during operation....a "mist" of oil is often enough to do the job, otherwise the cartridge can be drowned and turbo damage from inability to drain can occur.


Often you'll see guys posting videos of their ball bearing turbo spinning forever after the engine is turned off....this is because the shaft is fully-supported by the bearings and all times and doesn't need oil flow for operation. If it were possible to keep full operating oil pressure supplied to and flowing through a journal bearing turbo after the engine has been turned off, it would spin-down at a similar rate....but once the oil flow entering the cartridge is disrupted, the "pillow" of oil supporting the shaft goes away and the shaft slows down because of drag.


That in mind, I think the best bang-for-your-buck in a new turbo is right here...the FP HTA105: Forced Performance Turbochargers: FP HTA GT4205 JB Turbocharger

If you think the lag will be too excessive from the giant 76/105mm compressor, step down a notch to the 4294 (67/94mm) which is still 900hp-capable: http://store.forcedperformance.net/...PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTGT4294HTAJB

900hp capable, fully rebuildable, and uses a Genuine Garrett cartridge for proven durability. If you oil it properly and treat it right, it will treat you right for years to come. ;)
 
My friend ran a Comp triple ball bearing oil-less turbo on his evo (equivalent to a pte6262) with no issues. Thing spooled super fast and didn't have any issues as far as reliability is concerned.
 
The triple ball bearing format is for durability, not to make it quicker-spooling.

Here are some things to understand about the differences in oiling during operation between a ball bearing and journal bearing turbo:

- Journal bearing turbos need a high flow of oil to support the shaft during operation. While the turbo is in use, the shaft floats on a pillow of oil and doesn't directly-contact the bearings or the housing....if the oil flow is disrupted, bearing and component damage can and will occur.

- Ball bearing turbos require just enough oil to lubricate the bearings during operation....a "mist" of oil is often enough to do the job, otherwise the cartridge can be drowned and turbo damage from inability to drain can occur.


Often you'll see guys posting videos of their ball bearing turbo spinning forever after the engine is turned off....this is because the shaft is fully-supported by the bearings and all times and doesn't need oil flow for operation. If it were possible to keep full operating oil pressure supplied to and flowing through a journal bearing turbo after the engine has been turned off, it would spin-down at a similar rate....but once the oil flow entering the cartridge is disrupted, the "pillow" of oil supporting the shaft goes away and the shaft slows down because of drag.


That in mind, I think the best bang-for-your-buck in a new turbo is right here...the FP HTA105: Forced Performance Turbochargers: FP HTA GT4205 JB Turbocharger

If you think the lag will be too excessive from the giant 76/105mm compressor, step down a notch to the 4294 (67/94mm) which is still 900hp-capable: Forced Performance Turbochargers: FP HTA GT4294 JB Turbocharger

900hp capable, fully rebuildable, and uses a Genuine Garrett cartridge for proven durability. If you oil it properly and treat it right, it will treat you right for years to come. ;)


Thanks for the answer.

Is the 4294 maybe to big? I want spooling arround 5000 U/min. Rev limit max 9000 U/min

My friend ran a Comp triple ball bearing oil-less turbo on his evo (equivalent to a pte6262) with no issues. Thing spooled super fast and didn't have any issues as far as reliability is concerned.


Thansk for the answer.

Have your friend also power and how many psi he use the turbo?
 
You need to be realistic. You are asking too much for a 850whp turbo to reach full boostof 35-40ps around 5000rpmi. You need to face the facts that a turbo of that size will not reach full boost till 6000+rpm. A mid sized 35r hits that around 5500 give or take a few hundred rpms and still only flow max in the high 600 low 700s.
 
You need to be realistic. You are asking too much for a 850whp turbo to reach full boostof 35-40ps around 5000rpmi. You need to face the facts that a turbo of that size will not reach full boost till 6000+rpm. A mid sized 35r hits that around 5500 give or take a few hundred rpms and still only flow max in the high 600 low 700s.

Told him this in the other thread.. I only run one of the fastest spooling 800+ whp turbos available though, so what do I know? LOL
 
comp turbo is a great company with great quality products.. if i am not mistaken comp was formally innovative turbo.
 
Yea ill bet your car is sweet with that super wide hx52 powerband and a monster 430 hp!

It made that ~440whp @ 15psi and only 7k rpm on Boostin's Mustang Dyno with a base tune. 15psi without a boost controller came up at 4k, torque was table top flat from 4000-7000.. already wider than almost any 2.0 and this setup breathes well past 9000 :thumb:

How much does your car make at 1 bar boost and over 2k rpm short of redline on it's most aggressive tune? LOL

Next pull after the MBC was installed we saw 38psi, which it made just shy of 6k rpm but we had to get out of it. Torque was near vertical till the tires spun on the rollers.

Fixed the MBC, test pull it made 20psi but we had to shut down due to a coolant leak from my lower rad hose. Expect new numbers this week. Also this is a "stock" short block we're playing with for the next season or two.

So, again what's your car making? :hmm:
 
Last edited:
This is one of the most useless posts I've yet seen.
Useful only if you're completely unaware of who Innovative was. There's a reason that company is no more- they built total garbage. LOL
 
Useful only if you're completely unaware of who Innovative was. There's a reason that company is no more- they built total garbage. LOL

this is the point i was trying to reach but as i said earlier my post was cut short. although i only had 1 innovative turbo in my time i never had issues with it, just customer service was horrible. i have had 2 comp units and great success and customer service rocked!
 
Keltalon should weigh in. He was running a comp for some time i believe.
 
Ok i have a dealer in the USA and he speak german.

I hope I have succeed.
He says comp has a very good service and one year of guarantee

Garrett or Borg Warner would be a wiser choice for the size turbos you are looking at.. I know of no one that kept their Comp turbo for more than a season or two.
 
I'm thinking of running a triple ball bearing oil-less 6262 equivalent sometime in the future, anyone have any experience with the oil-less system by COMP?

Excuse my ignorance here: The CT4-6062 and CT4-6262 vary only by their compressor wheel & share the turbine wheel? If the 6062 makes 670HP with better spool that would be sufficient for my needs.
 
No but he has ran "many other comp turbos"

He's pretty much the only guy I've seen stand up for Comp, going back to when they were ITS and Joe/Justin from what is now Comp Turbo ran them into the ground.

LOL

My own experience on a couple platforms, most recently a 2JZ IS300 last spring, and that of many others would heavily outweigh one guy who's had good luck.
 
Keltalon should weigh in. He was running a comp for some time i believe.
That he was. I'll let this prior post go ahead and "weigh in" for him. :p

After fixing a few other issues the main culprit and don't ask me why, turned out to be the POS comp turbocharger. the turbo is not designed right. Me and a buddy took the comp unit off the car and installed his used pte 6262 journal bearing turbo and man what a heck of a difference the car spools super fast and hits full boost 38psi around 5000rpm and pulls much harder than the comp 6765 unit that came off the car.

I am just totally shocked after almost a year of trying to work with comp on getting me the right turbine and compressor wheel combo for my set up and $2800.00 later just to fine out that their turbos suck. I ordered the new pte ball bearing 6466 CEA unit and will be installing it when it get in and my work load tapers off. I will post a overlayed dyno comparison sheet of the pte 6466 CEA vs comp CT4 6765 for the benefits of the boards.

Just a word of caution when purchasing a turbocharger do your research get on the other boards and read read read tract times look at dyno sheets talk to people who have used a certain brand of turbo and get their feedback and don't get caught up in what is advertised on some website, like I did, because some companies pay big bucks for advertisement design to overrate their products. Comp is certainly one of those companies. :rolleyes:
 
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community
Boosted Fabrication ECM Tuning ExtremePSI Fuel Injector Clinic Innovation Products Jacks Transmissions JNZ Tuning Kiggly Racing Morrison Fabrications MyMitsubishiStore.com RixRacing RockAuto RTM Racing STM Tuned

Latest posts

Build Thread Updates

Vendor Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top