boostedinaz
DSM Wiseman
- 3,836
- 16
- Dec 22, 2002
-
Scottsdale,
Arizona
I used the wrong word, its not that certain bars are designed to fail. SFI cages aren't design to be rigid front to back, the front end as well as the rear end are design to not collapse into the cockpit area. The front end as well as the rear end tie points to the cockpit cage are design to "break" off the cockpit cage minimizing the danger of the the cage collapsing all together and any danger to the driver. Just like the Nascar incident the front end broke of the cage. In a rigid cage crashing into the wall at high speeds could squash the front end into the cockpit... I'm explaining what I understand from what my friend told me in my own words, I could call him up and help me write a professional and more deep explanation on the subject..
While I cant say I believe that I'm also not gonna put the time into researching it as it doesn't pertain to my field. I just can't imagine any sanctioning body actually wanting the car to break apart I know some have crumple zones but I can't imagine breakage. That guarantee's there will be a fuel spill not to mention once the damaged part of the car "breaks" off the driver is now fully exposed to debris and other hazards. How do they guarantee the part of the car comes off the same way no matter what the accident is like? If they hit something head on and the front breaks off with no where to go doesn't it then come into the passenger compartment?
I guess I just have a hard time believing those solutions are the safest ones possible.
In a front end collision our cage won't fail because of load paths and triangulation. A hit from any point in the cage get disbursed through the entire chassis. We don't have to worry about it coming into the passenger compartment because it won't.