FonZ454 said:

My 10.9@124-125 16g passes were only 7.0@97 in the 1/8th. Only once did I ever go 6.x on the 16g but I aborted that pass. I thought a 6.9 or quicker was needed for 10's, but every car will pick up differently.

You got killer 1/8th mph for a 14b man. Judging by your AWD (where the hell has that been anyways?), you can drive.

Click to expand...

You wanna share the break down on those timeslips??

ARFWD said:

You wanna share the break down on those timeslips??

Click to expand...

60'____1.599
330'___4.558
1/8___7.034
mph___98.16
1000___9.178
1/4____10.981
mph____124.95

60'____1.573
330'___4.537
1/8___7.019
mph___97.84
1000___9.165
1/4____10.968
mph____125.02

best 1/8th, let off after the 1/8th
60'____1.527
330'___4.514
1/8___6.978
mph___98.61


Obviously an AWD, on a 16g, on big hoosiers, but it's cool to see where the e/t and mph is similar, yet so different. I've been known to be inconsistent with my shift points though, There's been a lot of times when I've seen huge 1/8th mph differences due to shifting differently. An ECMlink controlled shift light is gonna be setup this year. My buddy runs one (just a simple LED) and he loves it.

FonZ454 said:

60'____1.599
330'___4.558
1/8___7.034
mph___98.16
1000___9.178
1/4____10.981
mph____124.95

60'____1.573
330'___4.537
1/8___7.019
mph___97.84
1000___9.165
1/4____10.968
mph____125.02

best 1/8th, let off after the 1/8th
60'____1.527
330'___4.514
1/8___6.978
mph___98.61


Obviously an AWD, on a 16g, on big hoosiers, but it's cool to see where the e/t and mph is similar, yet so different. I've been known to be inconsistent with my shift points though, There's been a lot of times when I've seen huge 1/8th mph differences due to shifting differently. An ECMlink controlled shift light is gonna be setup this year. My buddy runs one (just a simple LED) and he loves it.

Click to expand...

So sub 1.6 60' times are keeping the 125ish mph range to 10sec slips.

I didn't even know they where setup to run a gear based shift light. Shows how much I've been on the link forums lately.

You're literally right there man haha.

Not gear based, just rpm based. It's nothing new, just use EGR or FPR triggers at the rpm you want the light to come on.

bullettdsm said:

I think Phil can back me up on my so called "abilities" and my motivation to help out.


MB

Click to expand...

For sure! Alot of knowledge, experience, and seat time right here.

Being around Mark for 5 minutes makes you want to hit the track

He also likes to brainstorm about where the next tenth is coming from, which is right up my alley...

ARFWD said:

Example I never use power tools or air tools to work on any of my cars. I love my speed wrenches

I've noticed getting good 1/4 times are not to bad to achieve. Trying to hit a sub 7.00 1/8 mile is tough.

Click to expand...

Ha, me neither.....except the crank bolt.

As you said you're in 4th before the 1/8, I am as well, and I'd guess we all are. It's all about executing the perfect 1/8, then it's up to the tune, momentum, etc. to carry the second 1/8.

I'm with bullett here, I'd leave the car as is except for finishing your intake scoop and just grab all the seat time you can. Don't mess with the tranny yet, etc. I too, think you've got 10's in the car as it sits.

Also, the less you do, the sweeter the accomplishment.

IMHO

I'll agree there, the car has tens in it with the fwd trans. Clearly the 60' alone could do it. But, the point I was making about Joe pulling on you all the way down the track solidified what you already said. You can make more power, finish that intake scoop and perfect the tune. A little more time finding those perfect shiftpoints and you've got it!

Here is the part that is interesting to me. Here are the numbers for Joe's run versus Justin's 11.11 run:

60' - 1.758 - 1.626 - +0.132 seconds
330' - 4.783 - 4.577 - +0.206 seconds
1/8 mile ET - 7.24 - 6.994 - +0.246 seconds
1/8 mile MPH - 101.41 - 101.48 - -0.07mph
1/4 mile ET - 11.113 - 10.876 - +0.237
1/4 mile MPH - 126.26 - 123.83 - +2.43mph

Here are the numbers for Justin's 11.03 run:

60-starting there's a .002
330-60' there was .084 gain
1/8-330 there's a .056 gain
1000-1/8 there's a .007 gain
1/4-1000 theres only a .01 gain

So if you look at this, you can see Justin is making the power. On his 11.03 run, he lost time down the track, but was cutting that time down throughout the run. On his 11.11 run, he actually gained 0.009 seconds on the back half. I would agree with you figuring out the timing issues for first gear, finish the intake setup and keep tweaking the tune. Those along with seat time will probably get you there. Can't wait to get back home and get to working on my car to be on the track with you!

April 7th sac town if you can make it Justin

I think maybe you're confused Brandon, Joe continued to pull away from Justin the entire track. But, the rate of how quickly slowed near the end. I'd say Justin isn't quite making the power...YET! The mph might say he is, but the ET doesn't. There doesn't appear to be any part of the track that Justin crossed quicker then Joe did, despite similar 60's. With Joe weighing another 100ish lbs I'd say Joe was making more power. Now this is obviously very tough to determine for sure, we're talking different gearing too. None of this is meant to deter Justin though, in fact I'd take it as a positive that it means he can make more power and has plenty of room to improve! I'd say it's only a matter of time.

I'm taking a little more serious look at weight again on my car, there are more things I can live without, look out Dave and Phil I'll be gunning for your times! Then Nate!

Don't count me out completely just yet, I may make an appearance this year with a little turbo. My yellow car is going back together, again with whatever combo of parts I have laying around. (I have zero cash to spend, so it may or may not accomplish anything)

Nate Crisman said:

Don't count me out completely just yet, I may make an appearance this year with a little turbo. My yellow car is going back together, again with whatever combo of parts I have laying around. (I have zero cash to spend, so it may or may not accomplish anything)

Click to expand...

I'd never count you out Nate, seems like if the rest of us get going, you get motivated! And even with "whatever is laying around" you seem to get the job done. I'd rather see you out and running putting me further behind.

SBstar said:

I think maybe you're confused Brandon, Joe continued to pull away from Justin the entire track. But, the rate of how quickly slowed near the end. I'd say Justin isn't quite making the power...YET! The mph might say he is, but the ET doesn't. There doesn't appear to be any part of the track that Justin crossed quicker then Joe did, despite similar 60's. With Joe weighing another 100ish lbs I'd say Joe was making more power. Now this is obviously very tough to determine for sure, we're talking different gearing too. None of this is meant to deter Justin though, in fact I'd take it as a positive that it means he can make more power and has plenty of room to improve! I'd say it's only a matter of time.

I'm taking a little more serious look at weight again on my car, there are more things I can live without, look out Dave and Phil I'll be gunning for your times! Then Nate!

Click to expand...

Honestly Shane I'm just a tiny pebble in the road in front of you. You should easily beat my time....

Nate is where I'd be looking to beat if I were you, then that takes care of me too.

I'm sure I'll drop down the list significantly considering there's a 90% chance I won't make it out this year. But guess what that means? More people to blow by on my way to paying you back...hahaaaaaaaa

Phil1320 said:

Honestly Shane I'm just a tiny pebble in the road in front of you. You should easily beat my time

Click to expand...

Passing you might motivate you! I'd like to be the #1 awd guy, but I know it's not a position I can hold with my current setup. I'd rather see everyone improving on their efforts.

I wouldn't be all that surprised to hear about Dave putting something together again actually, if he already isn't

SBstar said:

I'd never count you out Nate, seems like if the rest of us get going, you get motivated! And even with "whatever is laying around" you seem to get the job done. I'd rather see you out and running putting me further behind.

Click to expand...

Not me, I want Nate to go down....

SBstar said:

Passing you might motivate you! I'd like to be the #1 awd guy, but I know it's not a position I can hold with my current setup. I'd rather see everyone improving on their efforts.

I wouldn't be all that surprised to hear about Dave putting something together again actually, if he already isn't

Click to expand...

Possibly....but your name isn't Leon

I'm sure Dave will make an appearance.....

SBstar said:

I think maybe you're confused Brandon, Joe continued to pull away from Justin the entire track. But, the rate of how quickly slowed near the end. I'd say Justin isn't quite making the power...YET! The mph might say he is, but the ET doesn't. There doesn't appear to be any part of the track that Justin crossed quicker then Joe did, despite similar 60's. With Joe weighing another 100ish lbs I'd say Joe was making more power. Now this is obviously very tough to determine for sure, we're talking different gearing too. None of this is meant to deter Justin though, in fact I'd take it as a positive that it means he can make more power and has plenty of room to improve! I'd say it's only a matter of time.

I'm taking a little more serious look at weight again on my car, there are more things I can live without, look out Dave and Phil I'll be gunning for your times! Then Nate!

Click to expand...

Brandon's right. Joe didnt pull away from me all the way down the track. Just a little explination to clear this up. If me and Joe went heads up and had a perfect reaction time it would go like this.

From 0-60' Joe has me beat by .002
From the 60'-330' Joe now has me covered by .084
From the 330-1/8 Joe has me covered by .057 (this is where I start closing the gap)
Now from 1/8-1000 I close the gap more and its only .007 gap
Then the 1000-1/4 its a .010 difference.

So you can see how I close the gap from the 330' mark .074 sec. I have the better power to weight ratio. I just lost out at the begining of the track and had to catch up time. I just couldnt catch enough time to run a 10.87. Also shows I closed the gap because I backhalfed the track with 25.308mph to Joes 22.350

ARFWD said:

Brandon's right. Joe didnt pull away from me all the way down the track. Just a little explination to clear this up. If me and Joe went heads up and had a perfect reaction time it would go like this.

From 0-60' Joe has me beat by .002
From the 60'-330' Joe now has me covered by .084
From the 330-1/8 Joe has me covered by .057 (this is where I start closing the gap)
Now from 1/8-1000 I close the gap more and its only .007 gap
Then the 1000-1/4 its a .010 difference.

So you can see how I close the gap from the 330' mark .074 sec. I have the better power to weight ratio. I just lost out at the begining of the track and had to catch up time. I just couldnt catch enough time to run a 10.87. Also shows I closed the gap because I backhalfed the track with 25.308mph to Joes 22.350

Click to expand...

Did math change since I was a lad?

At the 60' Joe is .002 ahead of you, by the 330 he is .086 ahead of you, At the 1/8th .143 ahead of you, at the 1000' .150 ahead of you, and finally at the 1/4 he is .16 ahead of you. Notice that he increases his time lead on you at every measured time interval. Therefore, he "pulls" on you for the entire track.

This is not meant to belittle or make your effort sound any less impressive! I simply was curious if you crossed any measured point quicker then he did and the answer is no, you crossed some in nearly the same amount of time, but not quicker. What this tells me is that you do not have a power to weight advantage on his thus far, OR, the awd trans gearing is that much better....or both. This means you have plenty of room to improve because we know Joe didn't have any magic fairy dust

SBstar said:

Did math change since I was a lad?

At the 60' Joe is .002 ahead of you, by the 330 he is .086 ahead of you, At the 1/8th .143 ahead of you, at the 1000' .150 ahead of you, and finally at the 1/4 he is .16 ahead of you. Notice that he increases his time lead on you at every measured time interval. Therefore, he "pulls" on you for the entire track.

This is not meant to belittle or make your effort sound any less impressive! I simply was curious if you crossed any measured point quicker then he did and the answer is no, you crossed some in nearly the same amount of time, but not quicker. What this tells me is that you do not have a power to weight advantage on his thus far, OR, the awd trans gearing is that much better....or both. This means you have plenty of room to improve because we know Joe didn't have any magic fairy dust

Click to expand...

Ok I confused the numbers. You are correct. The numbers I posted are right just not for the right person. The numbers I posted are how much he pulled on me at each interval. So the further we got down the track the less he pulled away. Or the more I gained.

So it should say this
Joes
0-60' = 1.626
60'-330 = 2.951
330-1/8 = 2.417
1/8-1000 = 2.108
1000-1/4 = 1.774

Mine
0-60 = 1.628
60'-330' = 3.035
330'-1/8 = 2.474
1/8-1000 = 2.115
1000-1/4 = 1.784

Difference
0-60' = .002
60'-330 = .084
330'-1/8 = .057
1/8-1000 = .007
1000-1/4 = .010

His times between intervals where quicker down the track. And his best pull was between the 60-330' mark. But the farther he went the smaller the gap between times.

I know your not trying to belittle. Just want a better understanding for all including myself on the break down.

Ok, just felt like maybe I was coming off wrong which wasn't my intention.

I do find it interesting that if both you and he shift into 4th prior to the 1/8th, he gains less in the lower rpms on you then the higher rpms. Could be as simple as what rpm you each came into 4th gear at though, and we're talking thousandths of a second anyways.

Phil1320 said:

For sure! Alot of knowledge, experience, and seat time right here.

Being around Mark for 5 minutes makes you want to hit the track

He also likes to brainstorm about where the next tenth is coming from, which is right up my alley...

Click to expand...

.....and we got a few tenths coming up (even if its not this year )

SBstar said:

With Joe weighing another 100ish lbs I'd say Joe was making more power. !

Click to expand...

Sorry I had a burst of laughter on this one. If you ever met or saw Joe you'd know why. I mean no harm, but this is almost literally correct (ok, maybe not that bad)

Nate Crisman said:

Don't count me out completely just yet, I may make an appearance this year with a little turbo. My yellow car is going back together, again with whatever combo of parts I have laying around. (I have zero cash to spend, so it may or may not accomplish anything)

Click to expand...

See this is what its all about. Every little movement by one, just helps to motivate others. Do it Nate. DO EET!!

See what you motivated Justin?

MB

Ha ha yes I know what you're talking about Mark. No disrespect intended either but that is kinda funny.

bullettdsm said:

.....and we got a few tenths coming up (even if its not this year )

MB

Click to expand...

Yeah we do....

SBstar said:

Ok, just felt like maybe I was coming off wrong which wasn't my intention.

I do find it interesting that if both you and he shift into 4th prior to the 1/8th, he gains less in the lower rpms on you then the higher rpms. Could be as simple as what rpm you each came into 4th gear at though, and we're talking thousandths of a second anyways.

Click to expand...

Nope didnt rub me wrong.

I guess we will see what I can do at higher elevation in two weeks. Last best was 11.3@121. Now to see if I can get some 1.5s and get real numbers.

bullettdsm said:

See what you motivated Justin?

MB

Click to expand...

Ive always been good at that .

Looks like the fwd came in stirring the pot and all the awd guys are gonna have themselves a lil competition between each other.

SBstar said:

I think maybe you're confused Brandon, Joe continued to pull away from Justin the entire track.

Click to expand...

Not on Justin's 11.11 run. Look at the numbers again:

60' - 1.758 - 1.626 - +0.132 seconds
330' - 4.783 - 4.577 - +0.206 seconds
1/8 mile ET - 7.24 - 6.994 - +0.246 seconds
1/8 mile MPH - 101.41 - 101.48 - -0.07mph
1/4 mile ET - 11.113 - 10.876 - +0.237
1/4 mile MPH - 126.26 - 123.83 - +2.43mph

Look at the two lines I made bold. At the 1/8 mile, Joe was .246 sec quicker. At the 1/4 mile, Joe was .237 seconds quicker, meaning Justin was starting to run him down. Justin was .009 seconds quicker on the back half than Joe. Again, this is Justin's 11.11 run, not his 11.03 run.

1SloEvo said:

Not on Justin's 11.11 run. Look at the numbers again:

60' - 1.758 - 1.626 - +0.132 seconds
330' - 4.783 - 4.577 - +0.206 seconds
1/8 mile ET - 7.24 - 6.994 - +0.246 seconds
1/8 mile MPH - 101.41 - 101.48 - -0.07mph
1/4 mile ET - 11.113 - 10.876 - +0.237
1/4 mile MPH - 126.26 - 123.83 - +2.43mph

Look at the two lines I made bold. At the 1/8 mile, Joe was .246 sec quicker. At the 1/4 mile, Joe was .237 seconds quicker, meaning Justin was starting to run him down. Justin was .009 seconds quicker on the back half than Joe. Again, this is Justin's 11.11 run, not his 11.03 run.

Click to expand...

.009

drop the thousandth and we have essentially:

*.00*

This means Justin ''was starting to run him down'' at 1319 ft. 11.5 inches....