The Top DSM Community on the Web

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. Log in to remove most ads.

Please Support ExtremePSI
Please Support Rix Racing

Casey Anthony, another unfit young mother

This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

No, the evidence required to convict wasn't supplied. Yes, the prosecution failed if she did it.

Does anyone here REALLY believe that if she gets away with murder via one medium of justice that she won't get what's coming to her in another medium? If you're bad enough to do this and get away with it, then you'll get it eventually. <== That belief takes only as much faith as believing the Justice System typically functions properly. You can't condemn another's belief in a higher form of Justice without condemning your own actions. Why do YOU do right? Being nice means that you want to; but not being nice doesn't hurt? Don't confuse religion with philosophy and the Third Law of Physics.
 
If she doesn't end up being an episode of "The First 48" in the future, I will be a little shocked.
 
No, the evidence required to convict wasn't supplied. Yes, the prosecution failed if she did it.

Does anyone here REALLY believe that if she gets away with murder via one medium of justice that she won't get what's coming to her in another medium? If you're bad enough to do this and get away with it, then you'll get it eventually. <== That belief takes only as much faith as believing the Justice System typically functions properly. You can't condemn another's belief in a higher form of Justice without condemning your own actions. Why do YOU do right? Being nice means that you want to; but not being nice doesn't hurt? Don't confuse religion with philosophy and the Third Law of Physics.

I agree

She will answer to God in the end though
 
No, the evidence required to convict wasn't supplied. Yes, the prosecution failed if she did it.

Does anyone here REALLY believe that if she gets away with murder via one medium of justice that she won't get what's coming to her in another medium? If you're bad enough to do this and get away with it, then you'll get it eventually. <== That belief takes only as much faith as believing the Justice System typically functions properly. You can't condemn another's belief in a higher form of Justice without condemning your own actions. Why do YOU do right? Being nice means that you want to; but not being nice doesn't hurt? Don't confuse religion with philosophy and the Third Law of Physics.

don't know what i like this comment!
 
I agree

She will answer to God in the end though
We've had our differences. . . But you and I are in line on that one! . . .

It's not just about belief, though. It's about what really happens. There's NO ONE who does this form of maliciousness that doesn't get it back to them. Even if you are an evolutionist, athiest, agnostic, religion-hater, whatever, there IS an order in place and it doesn't favor the evil. Whether or not you believe that it was planned and designed or just accidentally happened that way, it is what it is. I like to think it's not an accident because I've had some and seen some very wicked and depraved accidents happen. Doesn't go along with logic to think otherwise :)
 
We've had our differences. . . But you and I are in line on that one! . . .

It's not just about belief. It's about what really happens though. There's NO ONE who does this form of maliciousness that doesn't get it back to them. Even if you are an evolutionist, athiest, agnostic, religion-hater, whatever, there IS a system in place and it doesn't favor the evil.

Whether or not you believe that it was planned and designed or just accidentally happend that way, it is what it is.

I can agree with that... We call this "action-reaction".

:hmm: Although I wouldn't say "NO ONE", as this is too confident... exceptions could apply.
 
We've had our differences. . . But you and I are in line on that one! . . .

It's not just about belief, though. It's about what really happens. There's NO ONE who does this form of maliciousness that doesn't get it back to them. Even if you are an evolutionist, athiest, agnostic, religion-hater, whatever, there IS an order in place and it doesn't favor the evil. Whether or not you believe that it was planned and designed or just accidentally happened that way, it is what it is.

Yeah dead on man. Time will tell if she did it, if so the only reality show she'll be n is Intervention. Killing a child isn't something you can just recover from...
 
He'll say that 'anything could happen' is the manifestation of how the universe works. And alone why we are here. Uncertainty: 'A particle travels all paths to get from point A to point B." :)

But regardless of belief (atheism/agnosticism IS a belief), that's a good rule to understand.

I can agree with that... We call this "action-reaction".
Like I said, Newton's 3rd law ;)
 
The only thing that I know is that I know nothing... By that logic, I can only believe in things, but I can't know, the field of epistemology is too hard on my brain LOL.

BTW, you're a good man, even if I don't always agree with you, I still always have a good time arguing with you hehe.
 
There are too many people without children making some pretty absurd comments in this post.

As far as this whole religion thing...which I thought was prohibited...if you do not believe in God, then why worry about the people who do stating that she will have to answer to God? If you are sure He doesn't exist, then find something else to focus on other than someone taking comfort in what they believe in the interest of justice.

I really hope this thread doesn't get closed because of religion discussion, please let it stop here.
 
Everyone "knows" she did it but there is not factual evidence that shows she did it. This is the exact reason the jury is to not be biased, same with the judge.

If Casey Anthony is to blame for the death of her child, then the prosecution is CERTAINLY to blame for putting together a case based on mostly circumstantial evidence, and thus her getting away with it.

I'm not saying I know what happened; that she's guilty or not guilty. None of us know enough to make a worthy determination.

But, I will say this. There is a court [your own conscience] where accountability is held at a higher standard, and evidence is not needed for conviction to take place.

The founders of our country designed our justice system on the basis of one idea. It's better for a thousand guilty to go free, than convict one innocent man.

These concepts explain the result quite well.

In addition, the way that the investigation proceeded allowed for difficulties concerning the case. Even from the beginning, unbelievable laziness was evident. For instance, an Orange County Deputy Sheriff, Adriana Acevedo, spent 5 minutes “looking around” ½ hour after Kronk’s initial 8/11/08 call. Another Deputy Sheriff, Richard Cain (who met with Kronk) “poked around the water with a metal stick, then swept his head back and forth and said, ‘I don’t see anything,’ and pretty much, that was it,” according to Kronk. “I guess the deputy didn’t want to go into the water to look at the bag,” Kronk added. “The cop was like…I would say, he was kind of rude to me,” Kronk stated.

As mentioned, Caylee has presently lacked getting any justice.
 
There are too many people without children making some pretty absurd comments in this post.

As far as this whole religion thing...which I thought was prohibited...if you do not believe in God, then why worry about the people who do stating that she will have to answer to God? If you are sure He doesn't exist, then find something else to focus on other than someone taking comfort in what they believe in the interest of justice.

I really hope this thread doesn't get closed because of religion discussion, please let it stop here.

For the record, I have an 8 year old son and a 6 year old son. Both are more honorable than me, in my opinion. And a 3 year old daughter who is very much to me a complete homage to her mother. They are the whole world and all the future in this system we bicker about. I care enough not to party when they even hang their head. Much less come into physical peril. . . You know where I come from.

The hangout is a little more lax with the religion/politics discussions. Is it offending you? I am sorry if so. You have avenues to change that here. Don't hesitate to use them.
 
For the record, I have an 8 year old son and a 6 year old son. Both are more honorable than me, in my opinion. And a 3 year old daughter who is very much all my wife and her mommy wants to be. They are the whole world and all the future in this system we bicker about. I care enough not to party when they even hang their head. Much less come into physical peril. . . You know where I come from.

I don't understand what any of this has to do with the comments being made by people to the tune of "she is dead and you can't change that so who cares?"

The hangout is a little more lax with the religion/politics discussions. Is it offending you? I am sorry if so. You have avenues to change that here. Don't hesitate to use them.

I am talking about the stated rules by the administrator and staff on this site. I would like a topic I am interested in reading to not be closed down for those violations.
 
I don't understand what any of this has to do with the comments being made by people to the tune of "she is dead and you can't change that so who cares?"
I am attempting to qualify my statements to you personally. . . Take it as a compliment.

I am talking about the stated rules by the administrator and staff on this site. I would like a topic I am interested in reading to not be closed down for those violations.
If you are not going to take the actions encouraged if you are offended, then don't worry and contribute. You are not offended enough not to contribute. And the thread isn't closed. Go on; tell us what you think. . . So far you've laid out a rather compelling arguement not to bicker with someone discussing their religious beliefs ;)

This topic will get closed if the arguements become heated.
 
I am attempting to qualify my statements to you personally. . . Take it as a compliment.


If you are not going to take the actions encouraged if you are offended, then don't worry and contribute. You are not offended enough not to contribute. And the thread isn't closed. Go on; tell us what you think. . . So far you've laid out a rather compelling arguement not to bicker with someone discussing their religious beliefs ;)

This topic will get closed if the arguements become heated.

I am just saying, for those of who believe in God, there is no "maybe" in our minds. Atheistic people are more commonly in the, I may be wrong, but I think I am right group. Us who believe in God don't really have a, I may be wrong, thought. If you are not in the religion, you won't understand, it's not about arrogance, it's about our belief in the Bible and God, you don't really say yeah I believe in God, but he may be a myth. Think about it, if you believed in God, suspend your current belief system for a moment, then you believe he created you, rules you and ultimately determines the fate of your soul. There is no room for 70/30 there.

Now if you are atheistic, you believe we live, we die, the end, no more. There is wiggle room there, cause if you are right, but only believed you are 70/30 throughout your life, what's going to happen?

With that said, if those who believe in God believe he will judge her appropriately (good people wanting a wicked person punished, which I don't see any evil in that statement), wish to express that as an extension of how they feel, what is wrong with it? Why does an atheistic person take issue with it? If you are atheistic, you don't believe in it, so it shouldn't even register on your radar. It's not like that statement is saying, hey you atheist, you are a sinner and going to burn. Then and only then should a response be had, and that response should be to walk away or politely ask to not press our views on you.

It just seems that religion is under attack everywhere today, and while I can understand the attacks when zealots are attacking first or back, a simple harmless comment such as above should not trigger even a minor disagreeance. Everyone is too worried with everyone else now-a-days.
 
First page said what is IB4TL... LOL In before the lock LOL

Will justice is blind ya'll. It can't win everything. We just have to face the facts the world's not fair. Let this be the proof or not. Most likely we will never know if she did it or not. Only she will know!
 
No. 'Justice is blind' in the sense that it doesn't matter the person in question or the victim. . . There are rules; and if they are broken, there is to be punisment. Justice isn't blind when it's not there. It may very well have not been there in this case. Either there is justice or there isnt. If she gets away with it via the current legal system, does that mean she gets away from justice? The universe doesn't work that way. Yes, life is full of instances where you may or may not see justice in a timely fashion. Justice doesn't care how long it takes. As mentioned, the entire universe functions on the premise of "there's an equal and opposite reaction for every action." The time frame for the full circle of events proposed in the above 3rd law of physics is wildly varying and human social structure is in place only to attempt to moderate the speed of reaction.



GSX401, I see where you are coming from.
 
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community
Boosted Fabrication ECM Tuning ExtremePSI Fuel Injector Clinic Innovation Products Jacks Transmissions JNZ Tuning Kiggly Racing Morrison Fabrications MyMitsubishiStore.com RixRacing RockAuto RTM Racing STM Tuned

Latest posts

Build Thread Updates

Vendor Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top