TSI from Hell
10+ Year Contributor
- 666
- 8
- Jul 30, 2008
-
Bathurst,
NB_Canada
testtest YOUR SOUL!!!!
Noooo!! Not my soul!!!
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
Clever to write in white btw... never thought of that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
testtest YOUR SOUL!!!!
No, the evidence required to convict wasn't supplied. Yes, the prosecution failed if she did it.
Does anyone here REALLY believe that if she gets away with murder via one medium of justice that she won't get what's coming to her in another medium? If you're bad enough to do this and get away with it, then you'll get it eventually. <== That belief takes only as much faith as believing the Justice System typically functions properly. You can't condemn another's belief in a higher form of Justice without condemning your own actions. Why do YOU do right? Being nice means that you want to; but not being nice doesn't hurt? Don't confuse religion with philosophy and the Third Law of Physics.
No, the evidence required to convict wasn't supplied. Yes, the prosecution failed if she did it.
Does anyone here REALLY believe that if she gets away with murder via one medium of justice that she won't get what's coming to her in another medium? If you're bad enough to do this and get away with it, then you'll get it eventually. <== That belief takes only as much faith as believing the Justice System typically functions properly. You can't condemn another's belief in a higher form of Justice without condemning your own actions. Why do YOU do right? Being nice means that you want to; but not being nice doesn't hurt? Don't confuse religion with philosophy and the Third Law of Physics.
We've had our differences. . . But you and I are in line on that one! . . .I agree
She will answer to God in the end though
We've had our differences. . . But you and I are in line on that one! . . .
It's not just about belief. It's about what really happens though. There's NO ONE who does this form of maliciousness that doesn't get it back to them. Even if you are an evolutionist, athiest, agnostic, religion-hater, whatever, there IS a system in place and it doesn't favor the evil.
Whether or not you believe that it was planned and designed or just accidentally happend that way, it is what it is.
We've had our differences. . . But you and I are in line on that one! . . .
It's not just about belief, though. It's about what really happens. There's NO ONE who does this form of maliciousness that doesn't get it back to them. Even if you are an evolutionist, athiest, agnostic, religion-hater, whatever, there IS an order in place and it doesn't favor the evil. Whether or not you believe that it was planned and designed or just accidentally happened that way, it is what it is.
I can agree with that... We call this "action-reaction".
Although I wouldn't say "NO ONE", as this is too confident... exceptions could apply.
Like I said, Newton's 3rd lawI can agree with that... We call this "action-reaction".
For someone that believes in nothing, you sure believe anything can happen...
Like I said, Newton's 3rd law
Everyone "knows" she did it but there is not factual evidence that shows she did it. This is the exact reason the jury is to not be biased, same with the judge.
If Casey Anthony is to blame for the death of her child, then the prosecution is CERTAINLY to blame for putting together a case based on mostly circumstantial evidence, and thus her getting away with it.
I'm not saying I know what happened; that she's guilty or not guilty. None of us know enough to make a worthy determination.
But, I will say this. There is a court [your own conscience] where accountability is held at a higher standard, and evidence is not needed for conviction to take place.
The founders of our country designed our justice system on the basis of one idea. It's better for a thousand guilty to go free, than convict one innocent man.
There are too many people without children making some pretty absurd comments in this post.
As far as this whole religion thing...which I thought was prohibited...if you do not believe in God, then why worry about the people who do stating that she will have to answer to God? If you are sure He doesn't exist, then find something else to focus on other than someone taking comfort in what they believe in the interest of justice.
I really hope this thread doesn't get closed because of religion discussion, please let it stop here.
For the record, I have an 8 year old son and a 6 year old son. Both are more honorable than me, in my opinion. And a 3 year old daughter who is very much all my wife and her mommy wants to be. They are the whole world and all the future in this system we bicker about. I care enough not to party when they even hang their head. Much less come into physical peril. . . You know where I come from.
The hangout is a little more lax with the religion/politics discussions. Is it offending you? I am sorry if so. You have avenues to change that here. Don't hesitate to use them.
I am attempting to qualify my statements to you personally. . . Take it as a compliment.I don't understand what any of this has to do with the comments being made by people to the tune of "she is dead and you can't change that so who cares?"
If you are not going to take the actions encouraged if you are offended, then don't worry and contribute. You are not offended enough not to contribute. And the thread isn't closed. Go on; tell us what you think. . . So far you've laid out a rather compelling arguement not to bicker with someone discussing their religious beliefsI am talking about the stated rules by the administrator and staff on this site. I would like a topic I am interested in reading to not be closed down for those violations.
As mentioned, Caylee has presently lacked getting any justice.
I am attempting to qualify my statements to you personally. . . Take it as a compliment.
If you are not going to take the actions encouraged if you are offended, then don't worry and contribute. You are not offended enough not to contribute. And the thread isn't closed. Go on; tell us what you think. . . So far you've laid out a rather compelling arguement not to bicker with someone discussing their religious beliefs
This topic will get closed if the arguements become heated.