The Top DSM Community on the Web

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. Log in to remove most ads.

Please Support STM Tuned
Please Support ExtremePSI

Do velocity stack actually work?

This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ChiTownHussla

10+ Year Contributor
1,268
6
Nov 16, 2010
Chicago, Illinois
After searching on Ebay for a cheap intake pipe for the turbo, I came across these things called velocity stacks....Any ideas on if they work and would be feasible for out cars?

I know a lot of High HP cars have them, but what about on our lil 2.0's?

Thanks for the info guys.:rocks:
 
yes they do work however you will see larger results with larger turbo's.

on one of our cusotmers cars, we tuned his car to 490whp on his 2.0 setup. while on the dyno, we swapped in a same 4" turbo intake but with a velocity stack and it jumped to 517whp with no real changes.

on a 16g setup i wouldnt expect to see huge gains but they can improve results.
 
Are you on about v-stacks on its own or in a manifold? As stacks on there own are only used in N/A motors they do have good effects but not all cars can use them! And the stack inside the manifold from what I've understood as I'm still learning how they work and make them, they are to meter the correct amount of air. To each stack and make a smoother flow! Please someone correct me if I'm wrong as I'm relying on info I've read LOL
 
Every modern sportbike from my .6 to the big 1.3 and 1.4 liters utilize v stacks. In theory you can focus your powerplant's power profile by adjusting the length of the v stacks. I believe the longer stacks increase the velocity of the charge air (increasing upper rpm power), and shorter stacks increase throttle response and lower end torque. The newer yamaha models use ecu controlled adjustable stacks. The best of both worlds. Neat stuff.
 
Every modern sportbike from my .6 to the big 1.3 and 1.4 liters utilize v stacks. In theory you can focus your powerplant's power profile by adjusting the length of the v stacks. I believe the longer stacks increase the velocity of the charge air (increasing upper rpm power), and shorter stacks increase throttle response and lower end torque. The newer yamaha models use ecu controlled adjustable stacks. The best of both worlds. Neat stuff.

Yes they do... :D I bought an R1 back in December and what a ride it. It pulls hard enough from about RPM on up but once it hits round K and the ECU slaps the extension down on the stacks you get a hole other kick in the a$$.. Funny thing is that it is much the same concept as the variable intake design that both Mitsu and Toyota use to use. Difference is that Mistu and Toyota changed to different runners all together while Yamaha just makes the stock ones longer.

Another car I had at one point that had a velocity stack so to speak of was the 2000+ Celica. It had a plastic velocity stack in the air box right in front of the MAF sensor. It was held in by a small plastic tab and it broke on my one day allowing the stack to drop down into the air box and cause turbulence across the MAF so I pulled it out and believe it or not actually made the car run worse than with it loose. Made me wounder if you could tune the car by adjusting the length and size of the stack in the air box, but unfortunately it was a project I never got around to messing with.

So yes velocity stacks can make a difference.
 
"Real" velocity stacks:

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


:D

Would that be a Sunbeam Tiger?

Velocity Stacks, I have seen them on NoN- street turbo applications.
I do run stacks on my weber 48 IDA's, with filter screen ofcourse. (2332 cc VW stroker) 1960 beetle.
 

Attachments

  • modp_0812_06+nissan_skyline_gtr+turbocharged.jpg
    modp_0812_06+nissan_skyline_gtr+turbocharged.jpg
    59.4 KB · Views: 747
Last edited by a moderator:
a velocity stack is a " wringing every last bit of power available out of an engine once other areas of flow restriction have been addressed" type of thing
They go at the entrance of air intakes, and act to reduce and tune turbulence of incoming air. They don't actively increase the amount of air going into the intake, per say, but they do act to smooth the airflow, allowing for greater amounts of air at less resistance to pass through it. There are so many other areas of flow restriction to be addressed in a stock engine that should come first, particularly a turbocharged stock engine, that would yield much better results for time/effort spent, before thinking about what a velocity stack could do for you.
On a stock intake, you'd have to first remove the maf, and plumb for speed density. Otherwise you are going to be adding the stack for nothing. Then slap that trumpet on the intake of the turbo, no screen cause they are for posers and go to town.
 
Yes they do... :D I bought an R1 back in December and what a ride it. It pulls hard enough from about RPM on up but once it hits round K and the ECU slaps the extension down on the stacks you get a hole other kick in the a$$.. Funny thing is that it is much the same concept as the variable intake design that both Mitsu and Toyota use to use. Difference is that Mistu and Toyota changed to different runners all together while Yamaha just makes the stock ones longer.

Another car I had at one point that had a velocity stack so to speak of was the 2000+ Celica. It had a plastic velocity stack in the air box right in front of the MAF sensor. It was held in by a small plastic tab and it broke on my one day allowing the stack to drop down into the air box and cause turbulence across the MAF so I pulled it out and believe it or not actually made the car run worse than with it loose. Made me wounder if you could tune the car by adjusting the length and size of the stack in the air box, but unfortunately it was a project I never got around to messing with.

So yes velocity stacks can make a difference.

The variable velocity stacks on the R1 are great until you have to change spark plugs... You have to go through the radiator!
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 
Here's one I started for my 14b car about 4 years ago. I never did finish it before I scrapped the project though. Pretty much just like Joe's, but mounted a bit higher up, where the headlight once was.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


You must be logged in to view this image or video.


You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Everything old is new again. The concept still works even after all of the technology advancements of the last half century.


See Review: We Were The Ramchargers for the people who pioneered this concept.


Running its first few races as The Ram Rod, the car was eventually renamed as The High & Mighty after a John Wayne movie. The name also evoked the nearly 6-foot-high reach of the car's dual 4-barrel carburetors — above the level of the roof on an elongated "ram" tubes.

The car first raced at the National Hot Rod Association Nationals on Labor Day, 1959, where it clocked an E.T. of 14.41 at 103.24 mph in its best run of four passes for the day.

Ah yes I remember it well. That was the year I graduated from high school and build my own hot rod.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community
Boosted Fabrication ECM Tuning ExtremePSI Fuel Injector Clinic Innovation Products Jacks Transmissions JNZ Tuning Kiggly Racing Morrison Fabrications MyMitsubishiStore.com RixRacing RockAuto RTM Racing STM Tuned

Latest posts

Build Thread Updates

Vendor Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top