kevbojunior
15+ Year Contributor
- 116
- 0
- Mar 3, 2008
-
Cheyenne,
Wyoming
will gsc s2 cams be to much for an e3 16g setup? do they need upgraded valve springs as well?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
A member of the dsmlink forums did a cam test and the gsc2's made the most power and had the best power curve. I believe this includes against the bc280's. They tested like six different cams.
I think the gsc2's will be fine with a 16g setup.
You cannot make that comparison at all. Many engine variable effects the cams powerband or hp and torque.
I mean of course the GSC S2 would make more power than 280/280 cams on a 16g turbo whereas 280/280 would give more power with a GT42.
yea, but we're not talking apples to oranges like a 16G versus a GT42, you're just using an extreme to prove a point. Did you read the dsmlink thread of the cam shootout? all in all, I think it was very fair and solid cam testing with as little variables as possible, so I will support Pat and say that the resutls were fairly on point IMHO.
I don't get what you're saying. There are variables. There would be a huge hp and torque difference in 264s and 280s on a 16g.