Mr Peepers
DSM Wiseman
- 1,272
- 27
- Oct 16, 2005
-
Janesville,
Wisconsin
I got my head back from the local machine shop today; they said they took off .005" on top of .006" that was taken off in a previous resurface. They also measured it from the top of the head rather than the 3 indicator "cups" so I don't know if I believe there was even a resurface done previously.
Squish band=good and head resurfacing indirectly messes with the squish band when a spacer/thicker HG is used to make up for the material taken off. I'm tempted not to use any spacer or thicker HG to retain the squish band, hoping the cam timing isn't very affected from the head being a little closer to the block. Do the pros outweigh the cons? My block needs to be decked as well, although I'm guessing less than .005"; so lets say .015 worst case total.
Any risk of valve interference or enough cam timing off from using non-adjustable cam gears? I'm trying to figure out the lesser of the evils.
Stock rebuild although looking to push its limits.
Thanks
-Matt
Squish band=good and head resurfacing indirectly messes with the squish band when a spacer/thicker HG is used to make up for the material taken off. I'm tempted not to use any spacer or thicker HG to retain the squish band, hoping the cam timing isn't very affected from the head being a little closer to the block. Do the pros outweigh the cons? My block needs to be decked as well, although I'm guessing less than .005"; so lets say .015 worst case total.
Any risk of valve interference or enough cam timing off from using non-adjustable cam gears? I'm trying to figure out the lesser of the evils.
Stock rebuild although looking to push its limits.
Thanks
-Matt