q_dubz
Probationary Member
- 17
- 0
- Jan 9, 2008
-
DC,
D.C.
The reason i'm on this forum is to look for turbo advice...as you DSM folk deal with Mitsu turbo's alot as well as Garrett this would be a good place to ask i think....
So i have a 2001 2.0L 8v Jetta...my friend GAVE me his stock turbo off his '02 wrx (TD04L-13T) Now i'm looking to upgrade...since i did all the work to fit the turbo...i was thinking of keeping to subie upgrades(FP's TD06SL2-18g) but its not hard to jus get a different manifold and turbo all togther(T3/T4 50 trim).
All in all i'm looking for 350whp at around 24-25psi ON PUMP. Looking at the Compressor maps for the the two turbos they flow very much the same but what confuses me is that after calling FP direct and talking to a tech about it, he was saying that i can spin the turbo up to 28psi and that definately doesnt show when looking at its map. Where as the 50trim when looking at its map can spin upwards of 32-34psi. Anyway PSI is an irrelevent number at times...of course its all about volume of flow so when plotting on these compressor maps the differences in efficiencies is only 2 or 3 percent at various p/r and rpm with very comprable flow.
Ok i think i'm rambling....which turbo would you all go with? How close do you all think they are
So i have a 2001 2.0L 8v Jetta...my friend GAVE me his stock turbo off his '02 wrx (TD04L-13T) Now i'm looking to upgrade...since i did all the work to fit the turbo...i was thinking of keeping to subie upgrades(FP's TD06SL2-18g) but its not hard to jus get a different manifold and turbo all togther(T3/T4 50 trim).
All in all i'm looking for 350whp at around 24-25psi ON PUMP. Looking at the Compressor maps for the the two turbos they flow very much the same but what confuses me is that after calling FP direct and talking to a tech about it, he was saying that i can spin the turbo up to 28psi and that definately doesnt show when looking at its map. Where as the 50trim when looking at its map can spin upwards of 32-34psi. Anyway PSI is an irrelevent number at times...of course its all about volume of flow so when plotting on these compressor maps the differences in efficiencies is only 2 or 3 percent at various p/r and rpm with very comprable flow.
Ok i think i'm rambling....which turbo would you all go with? How close do you all think they are