Imback
15+ Year Contributor
- 1,299
- 260
- Nov 8, 2006
-
Long island,
New_York
I would think it would make more power at the boost level. Also full boost by 5700-5800 is a little on the laggy side i think. Either way nice #'s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
In my honest opinion no. This thing spools great and on a 2.4 it will be that much better. I honestly think this turbo makes an excellent street car turbo. wouldn't suggest anything different to be honest. I have a 6262 evo in the shop now and a 6266 galant vr4 clone coming in after that and I am sure they will be super happy with the outcome just like slow91.
I would think it would make more power at the boost level. Also full boost by 5700-5800 is a little on the laggy side i think. Either way nice #'s
I think the BB is very much worth the money difference, its not all about spool Precision has a very bad rep when it comes with journal bearing turbos lasting especially on alot of boost.
hard to say without a total break down of his setup, i guess even with meth it still holds him back alittle my 66 wheel spooled at about the same and made 674awhp on 29psi on e85. My car is no were near a timing monster it has almost none in it, its just an efficient motor setup.
Keep this in mind he is running e85, has 10.5:1 compression, nicer cams, and I'm sure a few other differences as well. I would say the compression and e85 make the largest differenceIt's kind of wierd you and him share the same compresser wheel yet, your car makes almost 200 whp more then his at 1 pound less boost. You two also share simular displacement engines aswell.
.
It's kind of wierd you and him share the same compresser wheel yet, your car makes almost 200 whp more then his at 1 pound less boost. You two also share simular displacement engines aswell.
My t-3 s366 made 662 awhp on a Dynojet this past week. Boost was 33 psi and the ET/ trap speed is inline with the race weight. I was warned not to go over 35 psi with my choice in standard ARP headstuds, and a standard cosmetic gasket. It would seem that 35psi+ psi is a normal thing to do now. I tuned my car myself running a 3.75 inch maft pre-turbo. I'm on dsmlink v3 aswell. You made more power then me and I'm running a bigger turbo then you. Your on a stock head, and I'm on a P&P head. Is the t-3 flange that restrictive for slow91 and myself? Is e85, that much better then race gas? Is the 66mm wheel that much better then the 62mm wheel? I'm happy for you and your car, but your car and tune makes me and other like me a bit confused and fustrated. Any insight would be appreciated.
Im on a T3 backhousing also the .82, i dont think the 66 wheel makes that big of a change maybe 30hp? E85 is a nice help so is the compression. It is tuned conservatively it has 8* peak timing in it. Car is on AEM not that should make much of a difference i don't think.
Im running an untouched 2g head, i believe the 2g head is a better design overall regardless of "port size" it is similar to the evo design and as you know evos make power pretty easily.
I can't think of another reason really, everything was built around pushing the turbo to the limit nothing was really skimped to much on, im hoping to make 800 when i upgrade the pumps and push 42-45psi.
Once he changes a few things up it will make more power, but it's never gonna be one of these record breaking 6262.
I'm wondering how much stock tb is hurting?
Kurt Brown, Kiggly Run 2g heads. There is no reason why i can't run 45psi if i would like with my compression ratio.
What headstuds and headgasket do you and slow91 have your cars?
Congrats !!!!!!!! My car did 114 in the 1/8 with the new setup. It was only able to do it once and was booted out for not having a cage. 102 could be a high 6 to low 7s 1/8 mile. Get more seat time and maybe a dual stage boost controller.Went to track this evening, just a 1/8 mile track n ran a 7.7@95 best on shitty street tires n crappy 1.9 60 ft, didn't wanna break anything!!! But I made several passes n just bout all them was at the 100mph mark, one pass I ran a 8.4@102 !!! Yea I know sad but it was the first time out with the car, gotta change my shifter cables, was hard to get into 2nd on a couple of passes. But overall not shabby buy I'm sure the times will get better!!! I'm confident it'll run in the 6s!!!
nice, just get better tires with my hoslet i went 6.9@102 on 27 psi with a 1.61 60ft, was this with the boost all the way up?