6 Bolt vs. 7 Bolt. Which is better for what?

Posted by fmars62, Jul 5, 2011

Please Support JNZ Tuning
  1. fmars62

    fmars62 Proven Member

    224
    1
    Joined May 30, 2011
    Middletown, New York
    Idk if there is a thread similar to this so sorry if there is i searched and havent found anything.

    But anyway, i remember I read somewhere that a 6 bolt is better for this... and a 7 bolt is better for this... but i dont remember what it said. Can you guys help me out? I know a 6 bolt is stronger but what would a 7 bolt be better for and what would a 6 bolt be better for? And just ignore the crankwalk topic please.
     

    Log in/Register to remove ads
  2. ed1380

    ed1380 Proven Member

    2,315
    24
    Joined Sep 29, 2007
    ATL, Georgia
    6 bolt head has larger ports which means better top end with some sacrifice in power down low
     
    Loading...
  3. jimbob_843

    jimbob_843 Proven Member

    502
    1
    Joined Mar 11, 2010
    Dorchester, South Carolina
    6 bolt has the highest stock bottom end record. Also it has bigger stronger rods and head has bigger ports. 7 bolts have held their ground but too many have you know what to give it a good rep.
     
    Loading...
  4. kenuwine4g63

    kenuwine4g63 Proven Member

    413
    2
    Joined May 26, 2009
    Charlotte, North Carolina
    Umm..The 6-bolt is a pretty good engine. The rods are strong and like said the head has way bigger ports. The 7-bolt is also a good engine. And with the CW issue i really believe that it depends on how you manage the engine with maintnence. I've had 5 DSMs all were 7-bolts even the one i have now except one. And ummm no CW here. But If your goin stock bottom and maybe a few head performance parts like just cams and want to run a pretty nice size turbo i say go 6-bolt. It can handle the extra stress thrown at it
     
    My DSM:
    kenuwine4g63 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse GST

    000.0 whp   000.0 lb/ft
    Loading...
  5. little-razcal

    little-razcal Proven Member

    269
    5
    Joined Nov 22, 2009
    Baltimore, Maryland
    This is only my opinion
    The 7 bolt head is very different than the 6 bolt head in the actual design and performance. The 6 bolt head, like stated, has very large ports which can flow a great deal of air. The 7 bolt (95'+) head, has smaller intake ports creating higher velocity. There are multiple other changes in the bowl and guide area's as well. This higher velocity helps in making more power down low through the mid-range. IMO the best combo for a engine under 700-800awhp would be a 6bolt bottom end with a 2G head. You will greatly improve your drivability on the bigger turbo's with the 2G head. Anything over 700-800awhp, you would want the 1G design to maximize airflow and not have any restriction. This of course is my opinion, but there is a reason why Mitsubishi changed head design midway through production. With that said, I have a 1G head, so I am not biased. Bigger is not always better in certain situations. You will get a thousand opinions on this, but just know that both heads will make power, only the 2G will shift the powerband a bit. Good luck.
     
    My DSM:
    1991 Eagle Talon TSi AWD

    9.890 @ 144.740 MPH
    Loading...
    oh-b-1g and dnhieu like this.
  6. AwD4g63TsI

    AwD4g63TsI Proven Member

    177
    10
    Joined Jul 2, 2009
    Fort Campbell, Kentucky
    The different head comparison has been noted. 2g head for better low down response, 1g head if you want max flow. As for the block though-the only comparisons I can see are these. 6 bolt=bigger rods and no known issues. 7 bolt=smaller(weaker) rods and a possibility of CW. I know plenty of people with no CW issues on their 7 bolts, but the fact remains that it may happen to your build. If you are starting from scratch and have the option of a 6 or 7 bolt block, I don't see why anyone would choose a 7 bolt.
     
    My DSM:
    1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX

    16.140 @ 88.050 MPH
    Loading...
    1bad99gst likes this.
  7. ed1380

    ed1380 Proven Member

    2,315
    24
    Joined Sep 29, 2007
    ATL, Georgia
    Also a thing about the 7 bolts. The 98 and 99 blocks were slightly revised and less prone to cw
     
    Loading...
    Eddieo likes this.
  8. turboglenn

    turboglenn Proven Member

    5,397
    85
    Joined Nov 5, 2007
    RIpley, West Virginia
    i thought it was 97-99 that were revised? IDK though, i got rid of mine fairly early on after popping it at the drag strip due to faulty wideband tuning.

    The 7 bolt blocks do make better boat anchors, the 6 bolts make better engines LOL
     
  9. ed1380

    ed1380 Proven Member

    2,315
    24
    Joined Sep 29, 2007
    ATL, Georgia
    Nope. Just the 98 and 99
     
    Loading...
  10. fmars62

    fmars62 Proven Member

    224
    1
    Joined May 30, 2011
    Middletown, New York
    wait what was revised in 98/99?
     
  11. gofer

    gofer Moderator

    5,330
    670
    Joined Feb 18, 2006
    South Gilbert, Arizona
    Strange. You should have looked through our sites FAQ's, seeing how this is one question we see A LOT.

    DSM FAQ's
    The thrust bearing, its split so CW cases never existed (to my knowledge) on the '98-'99 7-bolt.

    :dsm:
     
    My DSM:
    1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse GST

    Street Build

    11.634 @ 126.050 MPH
    Loading...
    arturorz likes this.

Share This Page

Loading...


Log in/Register to remove ads

Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community
Ace Race Parts Advanced Fuel Injection Archer Fabrication Boostin Performance ECM Tuning Extreme Turbo Systems ExtremePSI Feal Suspension Fuel Injector Clinic Jacks Transmissions Jackson Auto Machine JNZ Tuning Magnus Motorsports Miller Import Parts Morrison Fabrication & Design OHM Racing Race Components Inc RockAuto RoadSurge Spultronix Performance STM Tuned Strictly Import Motorsports VR Speed Factory