bigdnno98 said:

DAMN! That's light AF!

Click to expand...

Gutted fwd . It can be even lighter if I wanted to.

So you've run a 10.25@136 with an E316G? at altitude. . I give up........

Yup 6500' DA at a 4500' track. It's purpose built though. But in a 2950lb awd same track years ago we went 11.3@121. Had way more in it. Would've ran high 10s up here.

140mph is insane on a stock appearing turbo! Any interest in going FWD AUTO Justin? Using Link or AEM? Are you against trying the 68hta?

The hta68 is next. I've been using link. I'm up tossing the idea of Haltech. Links treating me well.

I personally feel that going auto would slow my times down.

I kind of want to ditch this FP Black for a HTA68

Sounds like the "purpose" built car is doing it's job! Can't wait to read 140mph from a stock appearing turbo in a post!

Anyone else dyno (or re-dyno) there 68hta setups lately? Or just dyno / track updates in general specific to the 68hta

No dyno, but I was logging around 52 lb/min on mine, previously seeing 34 lb/min on a 14b so the airflow should be pretty accurate. The 14b went 11.7 @ 115.8, so the HTA68 should've been good for mid 10s at around 130 in a 2800 lb setup. Hate to bench race though, never got around to running it, decided to pull it off and put the HTA76 on and save the 68 for a lighter build.

Steve: Any plans in the works for this 68hta build? I'm interested in your thoughts on an ideal build. I was going to PM you about it, but I assumed others would also be interested in what you have to say seeing as how you have documented builds on here that have yielded good results

We'd all be interested in hearing your thoughts on compression ratio, litre (2.0, 2.1, 2.3), long rod or stock rod ratio, etc.

90laserRSfwd said:

Eddie: Is your car FWD or AWD? Can you post a dyno sheet?

Click to expand...

It's AWD and didn't care to ask for a dyno sheet(maybe a good thing to have). Just got my hand on an actuator with a 22psi spring, so going back to dyno in the near future to hopefully max out this turbo. Will post result and dyno sheet.

Make sure you get a sheet this time! We'd like to see the curve! Also, are you on e85?

Has anyone hit 500WHP on e85 yet?

bo0st said:

Has anyone hit 500WHP on e85 yet?

Click to expand...

Page #5. Built 6-bolt running 36psi...

There is a part of me very much wanting to skip the evo III and go straight to this little puppy next.

So I'm not finding a clear answer on this. I've seen it mentioned the older 68HTA used a standard TD05 turbine, but what turbine is the newer "revised" 68HTA using? FP's website says:

• TW Measurements - 60.8MM (2.393") Inducer / 54MM Exducer (2.125")

That doesn't really line up with any of the numbers charted here. Maybe the TD06SL2 turbine? It is a Mitsubishi turbine, correct? Thoughts?

Good question. I thought they went to EvoX/18K stuff but that's wrong, too. They made TD06SL2 68HTAs in a small batch before but called it less than ideal, I doubt they would use it again.

GST with PSI said:

So I'm not finding a clear answer on this. I've seen it mentioned the older 68HTA used a standard TD05 turbine, but what turbine is the newer "revised" 68HTA using? FP's website says:

• TW Measurements - 60.8MM (2.393") Inducer / 54MM Exducer (2.125")

That doesn't really line up with any of the numbers charted here. Maybe the TD06SL2 turbine? It is a Mitsubishi turbine, correct? Thoughts?

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

Click to expand...

Honestly there's an insignificant difference between those measurements and the measurements of the TD06SL2's measurements. I'd go with you might as well just call it a TD06SL2 TW.

Just realized, they have the numbers backwards. A 54mm inducer and 61mm exducer is right on for TD06SL2..a little strange, given the history of pairing them together.

Just did some checking, technically they call it the TF06-07, so it is the turbine from the 18K. (Those specs seem to be 54mm/61.5mm)

Thanks! Yep, that's what I found as well. http://www.owendevelopments.co.uk/article/112/Evo_X_bolt-on_MHI_turbocharger_/

Turbine Wheel Inducer Diameter 61.50mm (2.421")

Turbine Wheel Exducer Diameter 54.00mm (2.125")

The inducer number still seems a little fudged. So, is it truly 60.8mm or 61.5mm I wonder?

gofer said:

Page #5. Built 6-bolt running 36psi...

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

Click to expand...

Awesome power especially on a mustang dyno for this turbo, but I am guessing the kelford 272's are why the spool seems to be kind of slow judging by the torque curve?

Not going to lie... I kinda want to give this turbo a try, as well.

I'm with you @95talongirl, however I think my 2.4 would be a little too much for this turbo. Would be fun though.

CrackedDSM said:

I'm with you @95talongirl, however I think my 2.4 would be a little too much for this turbo. Would be fun though.

Click to expand...

My 2.3 loves my 68HTA with a perfect crossover between 2.5K-3.5K RPM from my engine to turbo with daily driving. On the Dyno I reached 385/380 on 22.5psi with e70 and I'm around 400/400 with e85. Fantastic little turbo.