| Welcome to DSMtuners |
You are currently browsing the site as a "Guest", which means your are either not registered or not logged in. This also means you have limited access to our site and cannot participate - you also are browsing the site with more advertisements than logged-in members.
Register an account and start participating!
|
| Custom Fabrication: TIG/MIG welding, jig-building, metal working, fiberglass, carbon fiber, and other custom fabrication projects. |
 |
|
06-04-2012, 05:23 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#421 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: South Gilbert, Arizona
Registered: Feb 2006
Reputation:
|
- So, with the sway bar raised 3" above center line, would this decrease body roll?
- If the sway bar is angled upward 10*, without you compensating for it, in a hard turn wouldn't that increase torsion on the sway bar and possibly break it?
- Raising it to compensate for those 10* I'm hoping it will still clear the bottom of the chassis?
If there are benefits to raising the rear sway bar above center line without putting increased stress on it by angling it upwards (or running into clearance issues) then I think it's a good idea. Still, I wish I knew more about suspension theory.
____________________________
-Corey Jenson
E-OCHOCINCO Powered FP HTA68 / stock 7-bolt / Shep 4
|
|
|
06-04-2012, 06:34 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#422 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: Coloma, Michigan
Registered: Apr 2003
Reputation:
|
In theory, this proposed idea won't change sway bar operation by any noticeable or measurable amount. And it would be a solid solution to use a spherical end link on a single beam control arm. These reason behind these changes is simply be to make it all fit while attaching the end link to the top of a single beam arm.
|
|
|
06-04-2012, 07:28 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#423 (permalink)
|
|
DSMtuners Supporting Vendor
CompWorks

From: Eagle, Idaho
Registered: Mar 2006
|
You have that much distance between the lateral arm and the axle?
From a book or web site I read a while back.
Also where the bar is attached to the lower control arm, the connection should be positioned at right angles to the sway bar arm as well as the lower control arm. Any angle in the link can greatly increase the "felt" rate of the bar.
|
|
|
06-04-2012, 10:48 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#425 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: South Gilbert, Arizona
Registered: Feb 2006
Reputation:
|
Did you add that "hoop" over the diff for additional support? I couldn't pick that out in the pictures you posted of Johns. That looks pretty damn solid to me, Paul, just curious to see how these sway bar mounts play out.
I'm moving to AZ the end of July *cough* and won't have a garage for a few months while I live at the girlfriends parents house. *cough cough*
Looking great!
____________________________
-Corey Jenson
E-OCHOCINCO Powered FP HTA68 / stock 7-bolt / Shep 4
|
|
|
06-04-2012, 11:20 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#426 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member

From: Portland, Oregon
Registered: May 2008
Reputation:
|
Hey Paul, If I were going to go through the trouble of building the rear subframe out of CM I would ditch the stock arms and revise the geometry that has silly amounts of toe change through compression and droop.
|
|
|
|
06-05-2012, 06:42 AM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#427 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: Coloma, Michigan
Registered: Apr 2003
Reputation:
|
This one turned out to be a bit heavier than I thought, but not bad though. I just weighed it in at 24.4 lbs. So, 5.8 lbs heavier than the first one and still 28 lbs lighter than the factory subframe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofer
Did you add that "hoop" over the diff for additional support? I couldn't pick that out in the pictures you posted of Johns. That looks pretty damn solid to me, Paul, just curious to see how these sway bar mounts play out.
|
It's pretty much the same design. I just had to move the three bars at the rear (including the bent one) to give clearance for the OE fuel tank. This one just has a greater bend angle in the tube around the diff than the first one did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rx7ttlm
Hey Paul, If I were going to go through the trouble of building the rear subframe out of CM I would ditch the stock arms and revise the geometry that has silly amounts of toe change through compression and droop.
|
Like this?
|
|
|
06-06-2012, 09:41 AM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#428 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: Coloma, Michigan
Registered: Apr 2003
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by greengoblin
You have that much distance between the lateral arm and the axle?
|
Yup, that shoots that idea right out of the water. I made a trip over to see my car yesterday and took a peak at the rearend. I had forgot how close the CV shaft was above the end link. It really sucks for me to not have easy access to my car when trying to figure out things like this. I'm hoping to change that very soon though.
I'm wanting to save the twin tube arm as a last resort, so I'm still searching for an alternative idea. After seeing the clearances around the OE end link, I now see that it won't be able to be moved.
Next idea: I could weld in a mono-ball bearing mount in the center of the control arm. Then bolt in a single heim to attach to the sway bar. This would yield proper end link height and it would afford movement in all directions. Thoughts on this?
|
|
|
06-06-2012, 05:07 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#429 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member

From: Durango, Colorado
Registered: Jun 2005
|
How about going to a generic stock car sway bar and attaching to the spindles instead of the LCA? Lots more options for bar stiffness that way. There is certainly plenty of room to work with and mounting points aren't much of an issue. My friend Pagosa DSM keeps talking about trying something like that on his 1g.
____________________________
Nick - AWD turbo swapped USDM 7g Galant
|
|
|
06-06-2012, 07:13 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#430 (permalink)
|
|
DSMtuners Supporting Vendor
CompWorks

From: Eagle, Idaho
Registered: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by eclipsh
How about going to a generic stock car sway bar and attaching to the spindles instead of the LCA? Lots more options for bar stiffness that way. There is certainly plenty of room to work with and mounting points aren't much of an issue. My friend Pagosa DSM keeps talking about trying something like that on his 1g.
|
That is how my car is set up.
However Paul is trying to keep the cost of the unit reasonable so he want the option to run OEM stlye bars.
|
|
|
06-06-2012, 07:36 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#431 (permalink)
|
|
DSMtuners Supporting Vendor
CompWorks

From: Eagle, Idaho
Registered: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99gst_racer
Yup, that shoots that idea right out of the water. I made a trip over to see my car yesterday and took a peak at the rearend. I had forgot how close the CV shaft was above the end link. It really sucks for me to not have easy access to my car when trying to figure out things like this. I'm hoping to change that very soon though.
I'm wanting to save the twin tube arm as a last resort, so I'm still searching for an alternative idea. After seeing the clearances around the OE end link, I now see that it won't be able to be moved.
Next idea: I could weld in a mono-ball bearing mount in the center of the control arm. Then bolt in a single heim to attach to the sway bar. This would yield proper end link height and it would afford movement in all directions. Thoughts on this?
|
How would that effect the overall arm strength? Would you cut a hole int he tube and weld the ball flush into the tube and then mount the link in single shear?
Or would the mount be welded on top of the tube?
|
|
|
06-06-2012, 08:01 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#432 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: Coloma, Michigan
Registered: Apr 2003
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by greengoblin
How would that effect the overall arm strength? Would you cut a hole int he tube and weld the ball flush into the tube and then mount the link in single shear?
Or would the mount be welded on top of the tube?
|
The bearing cup is 1.75" diameter and is a full inch thick. there wouldn't be clearance to weld the cup on top of the arm. So, I'd have to cut the arm and notch both ends and weld in the cup. I don't think strength would be an issue because of the diameter and wall thickness that I use. But even still, I can add reinforcements if I need to. I'll tack together a prototype tomorrow and post pics.
|
|
|
06-06-2012, 08:55 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#434 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: Coloma, Michigan
Registered: Apr 2003
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarFawkes
I didn't read through this whole thread but I am wondering if a 1G version of this was built.
|
Not yet, but it will probably be a fall/winter project.
|
|
|
06-06-2012, 09:03 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#435 (permalink)
|
|
Supporting Member

From: Wahiawa, Hawaii
Registered: Mar 2012
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99gst_racer
Not yet, but it will probably be a fall/winter project.
|
That is good to hear. I am always impressed with the quality work you and the rest of the DSM community do. I'll definitely be a buyer of one of these amazing subframes whenever you have one for the 1G!
|
|
|
|
06-11-2012, 07:31 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#439 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: South Gilbert, Arizona
Registered: Feb 2006
Reputation:
|
Paul. Any verdict on this quick change in design, did it work?
____________________________
-Corey Jenson
E-OCHOCINCO Powered FP HTA68 / stock 7-bolt / Shep 4
|
|
|
06-11-2012, 09:36 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#440 (permalink)
|
|
DSMtuners Supporting Vendor
CompWorks

From: Eagle, Idaho
Registered: Mar 2006
|
I like that Paul. That was a really good idea. Is that really cheaper that building a twin tube arm?
|
|
|
06-11-2012, 09:43 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#441 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member

From: Demorest, Georgia
Registered: Feb 2003
Reputation:
|
Got any installed pics of the rear subframe? Obviously I drive a 1g so this is useless to me, but it still looks sweet lol.
|
|
|
06-12-2012, 07:51 AM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#442 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: Coloma, Michigan
Registered: Apr 2003
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rr06rs
Could there possibly be an option for those wanting to run a 3kgt rear diff and axles?
|
If the 3kgt rearend is larger in size than out stock one, then it would be impossible to fit into my jig. Which means I'd have to build a whole new jig to do it - which I doubt I'd ever do. But if it can fit my jig, then it's something I'd be willing to do. If you know of a place where I can get a bare rearend housing for next to nothing, I can at least look into it further.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofer
Paul. Any verdict on this quick change in design, did it work?

|
I am going to run with the arm/bearing idea posted above. I'll have the arms done by the end of the week and the sway bar mounted tot he subframe by the weekend.
Quote:
Originally Posted by greengoblin
I like that Paul. That was a really good idea. Is that really cheaper that building a twin tube arm?
|
Far cheaper. The bearing and cup aren't really that expensive and it saves a boatload of fab time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RipperXX
Got any installed pics of the rear subframe? Obviously I drive a 1g so this is useless to me, but it still looks sweet lol.
|
The only installed pics I have are from when we mocked it up on John's 2G before it was powdercoated.
Pics: Tubular rear subframe - Input needed
|
|
|
06-12-2012, 08:21 AM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#443 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: South Gilbert, Arizona
Registered: Feb 2006
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99gst_racer
I am going to run with the arm/bearing idea posted above. I'll have the arms done by the end of the week and the sway bar mounted tot he subframe by the weekend. 
|
YES! I'm glad to hear that it will be ready for powder by next week then. I'm having a surgery that will put me out for a few weeks on the 22nd, hopefully I've got this piece sitting in the garage by the time I recover.
____________________________
-Corey Jenson
E-OCHOCINCO Powered FP HTA68 / stock 7-bolt / Shep 4
|
|
|
06-25-2012, 11:12 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#445 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: South Gilbert, Arizona
Registered: Feb 2006
Reputation:
|
Looking good.
____________________________
-Corey Jenson
E-OCHOCINCO Powered FP HTA68 / stock 7-bolt / Shep 4
|
|
|
06-26-2012, 07:01 AM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#447 (permalink)
|
|
DSMtuners Supporting Vendor
CompWorks

From: Eagle, Idaho
Registered: Mar 2006
|
Glad to see it still moving along.
Maybe instead of building a jig for the peeps that want to use a different rear end you or Andrew could come up with a diff cover that would adapt them to your current mounting set up.
Just a thought.
Keep up the good work.
Kevin
|
|
|
06-26-2012, 07:09 AM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#448 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator

From: Coloma, Michigan
Registered: Apr 2003
Reputation:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by greengoblin
Maybe instead of building a jig for the peeps that want to use a different rear end you or Andrew could come up with a diff cover that would adapt them to your current mounting set up.
|
The complication is how my jig holds the diff in place while I build around it. The jig simply cannot accommodate a wider rearend. If I can get my hands on a 3/S rearend, I'll see if I can make it fit though.
|
|
|
07-07-2012, 02:56 PM
|
Show Printable Version
Email this Post
#450 (permalink)
|
|
Proven Member

From: fresno, California
Registered: Jan 2006
Reputation:
|
Looks great man!!
____________________________
90 talon awd
97 3000gt VR4
Last edited by snowborder714; 07-07-2012 at 06:36 PM.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
» Recent DSM Videos |
|
|
» Online Users: 783 |
| 303 members and 480 guests |
| Most users ever online was 1,704, 03-17-2008 at 09:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|