90AWDTalon
20+ Year Contributor
- 877
- 3
- Jan 5, 2003
-
Everett,
Washington
I was looking through some back issue's of Sport Compact Car and they had formula's for figuring out the data points to plug into the compressor maps. I decided to plug these into an excell spread sheet so I don't have to do the math every time I want a new point. While doing this I found two things that I have questions about.
Input for the formula's is boost, displacement in cubic inches, rpm, volumetric efficiency, and ambient temp. Output is CMF and pressure ratio.
First, these formula's where in two different issues. They were identical except for finding Mass flow rate. In one the formula was Di*displacement in cubic inches*(rpm/2)*Volumetric Efficiency. In the other formula it was (Di*Displacement in cubic inches*rpm)/(2*volumetric efficiency). I think the first one is right, because I used the second one at first and I noticed that as VE goes down CMF went up. I figured this was wrong and tried the other formula and found as VE goes up CFM goes up. Am I right in assuming the first formula listed is correct?
Second, according to these formula's as ambient temp goes up CMF goes up. This seems wrong to me, shouldn't cooler incomming temp mean more flow? Not less.
Input for the formula's is boost, displacement in cubic inches, rpm, volumetric efficiency, and ambient temp. Output is CMF and pressure ratio.
First, these formula's where in two different issues. They were identical except for finding Mass flow rate. In one the formula was Di*displacement in cubic inches*(rpm/2)*Volumetric Efficiency. In the other formula it was (Di*Displacement in cubic inches*rpm)/(2*volumetric efficiency). I think the first one is right, because I used the second one at first and I noticed that as VE goes down CMF went up. I figured this was wrong and tried the other formula and found as VE goes up CFM goes up. Am I right in assuming the first formula listed is correct?
Second, according to these formula's as ambient temp goes up CMF goes up. This seems wrong to me, shouldn't cooler incomming temp mean more flow? Not less.