The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

VP MS103 vs. Sunoco 100 (CAM2)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

autronicDSM

20+ Year Contributor
925
6
Dec 4, 2002
Kalamazoo, Michigan
Place that was on my way to work that carried VP fuels closed down. Now I have to drive out of my way to pick 5 gal drums of MS103. No big deal but I know there's a local Speedway station that carries CAM2 at the pump and I think it's cheaper then VP. I was wondering if there's any one here that used both and could tell me: 1) Will I need to retune fuel and timing significantly 2) Is CAM2 easier to get knock?

I have a stand alone with out knock control. I would hate to try CAM2 only to start knocking on my current tune. Please, I need to know from people who tried both in their car not from "my buddy put cam2 and his car was faster".
 
CAM 2 is leaded OMG i believe which helps reduce knock. Try it log it see how it goes i wouldn't spike the boost up too high right away.
 
WTF You might want to check Sunoco website first before you type. It's unleaded. Sunoco leaded fuels start off at 110 octane.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top